From: Mircea Ciocan <mirceac@interplus.ro>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Please help with a special RAID 1 setup
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 12:16:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FFBDC7A.8020702@interplus.ro> (raw)
Hello all,
First excuse me for a looong message, but I've tryed to give as much
relevant details as possible.
Please help me with this weird setup if it is possible and fesable:
I have this raid1 device, composed of two fibre channel devices
mounted in RAID1, it works absolutely flawlessly.
The resulted device is used for a lot of important data logging and the
ideea is to hotattach a 3-rd device ot the same size, wait for
syncronisation and after all of them are syncronised, stop the data
logging process, wait for a while, issue a sync command and hot detach
the 3-rd device restart de data logging and walk away with valid
filesytem backup of the main arry to be used as separate data analysys
source. I know that solution is somewhat cumberome but trust me this is
needed as is.
Now if you read untill here I managed to hot-attach, the attaching
was mentioned in the syslogfile, the data logging process continued
undisturbed, even the cat /proc/mdstat showed the new device added BUT
it only showed the same two [2/2] [UU] and it didn't touch the 3-rd
disk at all, also hotremoving was sucessful.
Here are some relevant data of the test setup that may be usefull:
[root@test]# cat /etc/raidtab
raiddev /dev/md0
raid-level 1
nr-raid-disks 2
nr-spare-disks 0
chunk-size 4
persistent-superblock 1
device /dev/sda2
raid-disk 0
device /dev/sdb2
raid-disk 1
/proc/mdstat BEFORE adding the 3-rd device:
[root@test]# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid1]
read_ahead 1024 sectors
md0 : active raid1 scsi/host3/bus0/target0/lun0/part2[1]
scsi/host2/bus0/target0/lun0/part2[0]
710938560 blocks [2/2] [UU]
unused devices: <none>
Then I add the 3-rd device:
[root@test]# raidhotadd /dev/md0 /dev/sdb3
/proc/mdstat AFTER adding 3-rd device
[root@nfs10 root]# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid1]
read_ahead 1024 sectors
md0 : active raid1 scsi/host3/bus0/target0/lun0/part3[2]
scsi/host3/bus0/target0/lun0/part2[1] scsi/host2/bus0/target0/lun0/part2[0]
710938560 blocks [2/2] [UU]
unused devices: <none>
Piece of the syslog showing the add results:
.....
Jan 7 12:09:01 nfs10 kernel: md: updating md0 RAID superblock on device
Jan 7 12:09:01 nfs10 kernel: md: scsi/host3/bus0/target0/lun0/part3
[events: 00000012]<6>(write) scsi/host3/bus0/target0/lun0/part3's sb
offset: 725598144
Jan 7 12:09:01 nfs10 kernel: md: scsi/host3/bus0/target0/lun0/part2
[events: 00000012]<6>(write) scsi/host3/bus0/target0/lun0/part2's sb
offset: 710938560
Jan 7 12:09:01 nfs10 kernel: md: scsi/host2/bus0/target0/lun0/part2
[events: 00000012]<6>(write) scsi/host2/bus0/target0/lun0/part2's sb
offset: 710938560
......
The problem is that no sync is done, as a matter of fact the 3rd
disk is not even scrached visibly ;(, did I miss someting obvious or
what I want is impossible ???
Thank you for reading such a long mail and for any help that will
lead me solving this,
Mircea Ciocan
next reply other threads:[~2004-01-07 10:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-07 10:16 Mircea Ciocan [this message]
2004-01-07 12:20 ` Please help with a special RAID 1 setup Catalin BOIE
2004-01-07 13:23 ` Mircea Ciocan
2004-01-07 13:31 ` Catalin BOIE
2004-01-07 13:47 ` Catalin BOIE
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-01-07 14:48 Cress, Andrew R
2004-01-07 15:33 ` Mircea Ciocan
2004-01-07 16:09 ` Luca Berra
2004-01-07 15:32 Dr. Greg Wettstein
2004-01-07 18:14 Rechenberg, Andrew
2004-01-07 18:59 ` Michael
2004-01-07 20:17 ` Mircea Ciocan
2004-01-07 19:28 Cress, Andrew R
2004-01-07 20:21 ` Mircea Ciocan
2004-01-13 20:50 linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3FFBDC7A.8020702@interplus.ro \
--to=mirceac@interplus.ro \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).