* Adaptec 39160 RAID ?!
@ 2004-02-10 13:13 Thomas Graham
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Graham @ 2004-02-10 13:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
Adaptec 39160 support RAID feature, but how could I config it on linux ?
Thanks. ( by the way, 39160 is a software or hardware RAID ? )
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* RE: Adaptec 39160 RAID ?!
@ 2004-02-10 18:24 Rechenberg, Andrew
2004-02-10 20:18 ` Jeff Garzik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Rechenberg, Andrew @ 2004-02-10 18:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Graham, linux-raid
The Adaptec 39160 is just a plain SCSI card - the card does not have any
RAID capabilities.
You can use Linux software RAID to create a RAID array with disks
attached to the 39160 (we have 4 our these cards in one of our servers),
but the card does not have any RAID capabilities native.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
> [mailto:linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Graham
> Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 8:13 AM
> To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Adaptec 39160 RAID ?!
>
> Adaptec 39160 support RAID feature, but how could I config it
> on linux ?
> Thanks. ( by the way, 39160 is a software or hardware RAID ? )
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> linux-raid" in the body of a message to
> majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at
> http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Adaptec 39160 RAID ?!
2004-02-10 18:24 Adaptec 39160 RAID ?! Rechenberg, Andrew
@ 2004-02-10 20:18 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-02-10 20:33 ` Scott Long
2004-02-10 20:43 ` Paul Clements
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2004-02-10 20:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rechenberg, Andrew; +Cc: Thomas Graham, linux-raid
Rechenberg, Andrew wrote:
> The Adaptec 39160 is just a plain SCSI card - the card does not have any
> RAID capabilities.
>
> You can use Linux software RAID to create a RAID array with disks
> attached to the 39160 (we have 4 our these cards in one of our servers),
> but the card does not have any RAID capabilities native.
Yes, but doesn't the card ship with "fake RAID"? i.e. no RAID hardware,
but BIOS has a RAID array setup utility and thus fools the user into
thinking he has h/w RAID :)
Jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Adaptec 39160 RAID ?!
2004-02-10 20:18 ` Jeff Garzik
@ 2004-02-10 20:33 ` Scott Long
2004-02-10 20:43 ` Paul Clements
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Scott Long @ 2004-02-10 20:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Garzik; +Cc: Rechenberg, Andrew, Thomas Graham, linux-raid
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Rechenberg, Andrew wrote:
>
>>The Adaptec 39160 is just a plain SCSI card - the card does not have
>
> any
>
>>RAID capabilities.
>>
>>You can use Linux software RAID to create a RAID array with disks
>>attached to the 39160 (we have 4 our these cards in one of our
>
> servers),
>
>>but the card does not have any RAID capabilities native.
>
>
>
> Yes, but doesn't the card ship with "fake RAID"? i.e. no RAID hardware,
>
> but BIOS has a RAID array setup utility and thus fools the user into
> thinking he has h/w RAID :)
>
> Jeff
>
>
The Adaptec Ultra160 products do not ship with software/BIOS raid.
Scott
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Adaptec 39160 RAID ?!
2004-02-10 20:18 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-02-10 20:33 ` Scott Long
@ 2004-02-10 20:43 ` Paul Clements
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Paul Clements @ 2004-02-10 20:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> Rechenberg, Andrew wrote:
> > The Adaptec 39160 is just a plain SCSI card - the card does not have any
> > RAID capabilities.
> >
> > You can use Linux software RAID to create a RAID array with disks
> > attached to the 39160 (we have 4 our these cards in one of our servers),
> > but the card does not have any RAID capabilities native.
>
> Yes, but doesn't the card ship with "fake RAID"?
No, it's just a plain old Ultra160 Dual Channel SCSI Host Adapter.
--
Paul
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Adaptec 39160 RAID ?!
[not found] <S263491AbUBKAtC/20040211004902Z+28@vger.kernel.org>
@ 2004-02-11 1:36 ` Luke Rosenthal
2004-02-11 2:33 ` Scott Long
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Luke Rosenthal @ 2004-02-11 1:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
> > Yes, but doesn't the card ship with "fake RAID"?
>
> No, it's just a plain old Ultra160 Dual Channel SCSI Host Adapter.
I just purchased one actually, have hooked it up to a Quantum Atlas 10K2
and can't seem to get them talking in Ultra160 mode. Here's the proc
output:
Adaptec AIC7xxx driver version: 6.2.8
aic7899: Ultra160 Wide Channel B, SCSI Id=0, 32/253 SCBs
Serial EEPROM:
0xc33a 0xc33a 0xc33a 0xc33a 0xc33a 0xc33a 0xc33a 0xc33a
0xc33a 0xc33a 0xc33a 0xc33a 0xc33a 0xc33a 0xc33a 0x43bb
0xb8f4 0x5d5c 0x2800 0x0010 0xffff 0xffff 0xffff 0xffff
0xffff 0xffff 0xffff 0xffff 0xffff 0xffff 0x0250 0xf4c7
Channel A Target 0 Negotiation Settings
User: 160.000MB/s transfers (80.000MHz DT, offset 255, 16bit)
[snip snip Targets 1-14, nothing hooked up]
Channel A Target 15 Negotiation Settings
User: 160.000MB/s transfers (80.000MHz DT, offset 255, 16bit)
Goal: 40.000MB/s transfers (20.000MHz, offset 127, 16bit)
Curr: 40.000MB/s transfers (20.000MHz, offset 127, 16bit)
Channel A Target 15 Lun 0 Settings
Commands Queued 438859
Commands Active 0
Command Openings 32
Max Tagged Openings 32
Device Queue Frozen Count 0
The drive has a SCA connector on the back, with a sticker on the connector
stating "Ultra160/LVD/SE". To connect this drive I've used an adapter
which converts the SCA connection into a regular 68-pin internal one, then
used a terminated cable with Ultra160/LVD/SE marked on both the connectors
(there's 4 of them) AND the terminator. I've tried turning the internal
terminator in the Adaptec BIOS on and off with no change. There's no
other devices on this bus other than the drive & the host adapter.
Is this normal? What do "User", "goal" and "curr" mean? Why are there so
many commands queued?
Luke.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Adaptec 39160 RAID ?!
2004-02-11 1:36 ` Luke Rosenthal
@ 2004-02-11 2:33 ` Scott Long
2004-02-11 4:18 ` Guy
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Scott Long @ 2004-02-11 2:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Luke Rosenthal; +Cc: linux-raid
Luke Rosenthal wrote:
>>>Yes, but doesn't the card ship with "fake RAID"?
>>
>>No, it's just a plain old Ultra160 Dual Channel SCSI Host Adapter.
>
>
> I just purchased one actually, have hooked it up to a Quantum Atlas 10K2
>
> and can't seem to get them talking in Ultra160 mode. Here's the proc
> output:
>
>
> Adaptec AIC7xxx driver version: 6.2.8
> aic7899: Ultra160 Wide Channel B, SCSI Id=0, 32/253 SCBs
>
> Serial EEPROM:
> 0xc33a 0xc33a 0xc33a 0xc33a 0xc33a 0xc33a 0xc33a 0xc33a
> 0xc33a 0xc33a 0xc33a 0xc33a 0xc33a 0xc33a 0xc33a 0x43bb
> 0xb8f4 0x5d5c 0x2800 0x0010 0xffff 0xffff 0xffff 0xffff
> 0xffff 0xffff 0xffff 0xffff 0xffff 0xffff 0x0250 0xf4c7
>
> Channel A Target 0 Negotiation Settings
> User: 160.000MB/s transfers (80.000MHz DT, offset 255, 16bit)
> [snip snip Targets 1-14, nothing hooked up]
> Channel A Target 15 Negotiation Settings
> User: 160.000MB/s transfers (80.000MHz DT, offset 255, 16bit)
> Goal: 40.000MB/s transfers (20.000MHz, offset 127, 16bit)
> Curr: 40.000MB/s transfers (20.000MHz, offset 127, 16bit)
> Channel A Target 15 Lun 0 Settings
> Commands Queued 438859
> Commands Active 0
> Command Openings 32
> Max Tagged Openings 32
> Device Queue Frozen Count 0
>
>
> The drive has a SCA connector on the back, with a sticker on the
> connector
> stating "Ultra160/LVD/SE". To connect this drive I've used an adapter
> which converts the SCA connection into a regular 68-pin internal one,
> then
> used a terminated cable with Ultra160/LVD/SE marked on both the
> connectors
> (there's 4 of them) AND the terminator. I've tried turning the internal
>
> terminator in the Adaptec BIOS on and off with no change. There's no
> other devices on this bus other than the drive & the host adapter.
>
For whatever reason, the bus is running in single ended mode. I don't
have a guide to the 10k2 handy (and google is turning up empty), but it
might either be jumpered wrong, or you might have a cabling issue. You
might also want to check that the SCA<->68 pin coverter isn't
responsible.
> Is this normal? What do "User", "goal" and "curr" mean?
User is what the BIOS is set to
Goal is the best that we think that we can get
Curr is what we are actually running at
> Why are there so many commands queued?
This is just a cummulative count since the system booted.
Scott
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* RE: Adaptec 39160 RAID ?!
2004-02-11 2:33 ` Scott Long
@ 2004-02-11 4:18 ` Guy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Guy @ 2004-02-11 4:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Scott Long', 'Luke Rosenthal'; +Cc: linux-raid
I have 2 types of 68-80 pin SCA adapters.
1 has AT on the end on the model number. These also have resister packs.
This is a single ended adapter. It would not support LVD.
The others have LS at the end of the model number. No resister packs, and
are LVD.
SE can do 40 MB/s.
LVD can do 80/160/320 MB/s depending on your hardware.
I don't think my SCA adapters were designed for 160, since my hardware can
only do 80 I don't care.
So, check your 68-80 adapters.
Also, most LVD SCSI disks have a "force SE" jumper. Be sure you don't have
this set. If you do, your disks would be in single ended mode, and limited
to 40 MB/s. If the URL below is correct, you disk also has this jumper.
Maxtor bought Quantum, or part of it.
http://www.maxtor.com/en/documentation/pdf_jumper_settings/atlas_10k_jumpers
.pdf
Guy
-----Original Message-----
From: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
[mailto:linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Scott Long
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 9:33 PM
To: Luke Rosenthal
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Adaptec 39160 RAID ?!
Luke Rosenthal wrote:
>>>Yes, but doesn't the card ship with "fake RAID"?
>>
>>No, it's just a plain old Ultra160 Dual Channel SCSI Host Adapter.
>
>
> I just purchased one actually, have hooked it up to a Quantum Atlas 10K2
>
> and can't seem to get them talking in Ultra160 mode. Here's the proc
> output:
>
>
> Adaptec AIC7xxx driver version: 6.2.8
> aic7899: Ultra160 Wide Channel B, SCSI Id=0, 32/253 SCBs
>
> Serial EEPROM:
> 0xc33a 0xc33a 0xc33a 0xc33a 0xc33a 0xc33a 0xc33a 0xc33a
> 0xc33a 0xc33a 0xc33a 0xc33a 0xc33a 0xc33a 0xc33a 0x43bb
> 0xb8f4 0x5d5c 0x2800 0x0010 0xffff 0xffff 0xffff 0xffff
> 0xffff 0xffff 0xffff 0xffff 0xffff 0xffff 0x0250 0xf4c7
>
> Channel A Target 0 Negotiation Settings
> User: 160.000MB/s transfers (80.000MHz DT, offset 255, 16bit)
> [snip snip Targets 1-14, nothing hooked up]
> Channel A Target 15 Negotiation Settings
> User: 160.000MB/s transfers (80.000MHz DT, offset 255, 16bit)
> Goal: 40.000MB/s transfers (20.000MHz, offset 127, 16bit)
> Curr: 40.000MB/s transfers (20.000MHz, offset 127, 16bit)
> Channel A Target 15 Lun 0 Settings
> Commands Queued 438859
> Commands Active 0
> Command Openings 32
> Max Tagged Openings 32
> Device Queue Frozen Count 0
>
>
> The drive has a SCA connector on the back, with a sticker on the
> connector
> stating "Ultra160/LVD/SE". To connect this drive I've used an adapter
> which converts the SCA connection into a regular 68-pin internal one,
> then
> used a terminated cable with Ultra160/LVD/SE marked on both the
> connectors
> (there's 4 of them) AND the terminator. I've tried turning the internal
>
> terminator in the Adaptec BIOS on and off with no change. There's no
> other devices on this bus other than the drive & the host adapter.
>
For whatever reason, the bus is running in single ended mode. I don't
have a guide to the 10k2 handy (and google is turning up empty), but it
might either be jumpered wrong, or you might have a cabling issue. You
might also want to check that the SCA<->68 pin coverter isn't
responsible.
> Is this normal? What do "User", "goal" and "curr" mean?
User is what the BIOS is set to
Goal is the best that we think that we can get
Curr is what we are actually running at
> Why are there so many commands queued?
This is just a cummulative count since the system booted.
Scott
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-02-11 4:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-02-10 18:24 Adaptec 39160 RAID ?! Rechenberg, Andrew
2004-02-10 20:18 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-02-10 20:33 ` Scott Long
2004-02-10 20:43 ` Paul Clements
[not found] <S263491AbUBKAtC/20040211004902Z+28@vger.kernel.org>
2004-02-11 1:36 ` Luke Rosenthal
2004-02-11 2:33 ` Scott Long
2004-02-11 4:18 ` Guy
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-10 13:13 Thomas Graham
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).