From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH] klibc update Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 14:16:09 -0500 Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <40575279.7040408@pobox.com> References: <4056B0DB.9020008@pobox.com> <20040316005229.53e08c0c.akpm@osdl.org> <20040316153719.GA13723@kroah.com> <20040316111026.6729e153.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20040316111026.6729e153.akpm@osdl.org> To: Andrew Morton Cc: Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk, bos@serpentine.com, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids Andrew Morton wrote: > Greg KH wrote: > >>On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 12:52:29AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: >> >>>It's so long since klibc was discussed (ie: more than five minutes ago) >>>that I forget the reasons why it should be delivered via the kernel tree. >>> >>>Remind me please? >> >>We need a way to build the userspace programs that get put into >>initramfs that will be needed to boot the kernel. >> >>That help? > > > My grey cells thank you. > > Does klibc have a bk home anywhere, so I can start sucking it in? > > There is the one I subtlely posted in my original email :) bk://kernel.bkbits.net/jgarzik/klibc-2.5 Bryan O'Sullivan and Greg KH at varying times in the past had BK trees, but I didn't know of any up-to-date one. Note that it isn't my intention to become klibc maintainer... just in case anybody started getting ideas... :) Jeff