* 800G RAID5 w/ what FS?
@ 2004-04-05 17:11 Jason C. Leach
2004-04-05 17:52 ` Brad Campbell
2004-04-06 0:55 ` Clemens Schwaighofer
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jason C. Leach @ 2004-04-05 17:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: RAID Linux
hi,
I was told reiserfs does not work too well with RAID. Is this true? If
so I'll go with ext3. I am using a Promise SX6000 to create a 800G
RAID5 array.
Thanks,
Jason.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: 800G RAID5 w/ what FS?
2004-04-05 17:11 800G RAID5 w/ what FS? Jason C. Leach
@ 2004-04-05 17:52 ` Brad Campbell
2004-04-06 13:19 ` Mike Dresser
2004-04-06 0:55 ` Clemens Schwaighofer
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Brad Campbell @ 2004-04-05 17:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason C. Leach; +Cc: RAID Linux
Jason C. Leach wrote:
> hi,
>
> I was told reiserfs does not work too well with RAID. Is this true? If
> so I'll go with ext3. I am using a Promise SX6000 to create a 800G
> RAID5 array.
I was using ext3 on a 720GB array, and now a 1.4TB array. I have no problems with it besides the 3-4
hour fsck time when I decide to force a fsck :p)
Regards,
Brad
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: 800G RAID5 w/ what FS?
2004-04-05 17:52 ` Brad Campbell
@ 2004-04-06 13:19 ` Mike Dresser
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mike Dresser @ 2004-04-06 13:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Brad Campbell wrote:
> I was using ext3 on a 720GB array, and now a 1.4TB array. I have no problems with it besides the 3-4
> hour fsck time when I decide to force a fsck :p)
Ext3 on a 700gb raid5 off a 3ware 7500-4lp. Only problems I've had is
that the latency to do anything more with the disk goes sky high when
there's a lot of disk activity.
Which may or may not be related to the 700gb partition :)
Mike
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: 800G RAID5 w/ what FS?
2004-04-05 17:11 800G RAID5 w/ what FS? Jason C. Leach
2004-04-05 17:52 ` Brad Campbell
@ 2004-04-06 0:55 ` Clemens Schwaighofer
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Clemens Schwaighofer @ 2004-04-06 0:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason C. Leach; +Cc: RAID Linux
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jason C. Leach wrote:
| hi,
|
| I was told reiserfs does not work too well with RAID. Is this true? If
| so I'll go with ext3. I am using a Promise SX6000 to create a 800G
| RAID5 array.
well in my opinion an FS depends on what you want to do. ReiserFS is
very good with a lot of small files (maildir eg), but I only use it on
an Hardware Raid at the moment.
I have very good experience with XFS. I run it on an LVM on an
hardwareraid and on an raid5 software raid without any problems :)
ext3 is of course a save route, thought from time to time you read about
problems with ext3 and software raid. so before you gon into production
I'd do some tests :)
- --
Clemens Schwaighofer - IT Engineer & System Administration
==========================================================
TEQUILA\Japan, 6-17-2 Ginza Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-8167, JAPAN
Tel: +81-(0)3-3545-7703 Fax: +81-(0)3-3545-7343
http://www.tequila.co.jp
==========================================================
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAcgAcjBz/yQjBxz8RAhlyAJ4sLbndQQ1M36RFyV4AXkpMYEgd8ACfSELK
ZyvcPzkKi9F1lIe+WSn+eZg=
=SN0e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-04-06 13:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-04-05 17:11 800G RAID5 w/ what FS? Jason C. Leach
2004-04-05 17:52 ` Brad Campbell
2004-04-06 13:19 ` Mike Dresser
2004-04-06 0:55 ` Clemens Schwaighofer
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).