From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gustavo Franco Subject: Re: Problems with RAID1 using SATA disks. Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 20:51:23 -0300 Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <40A2B87B.7050306@acm.org> References: <40A255D5.3090602@acm.org> <1084381339.26186.5.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1084381339.26186.5.camel@localhost> To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids John Lange wrote: >On Wed, 2004-05-12 at 11:50, Gustavo Franco wrote: > > >>linears, but i haven't assembled it yet, i'm having problems when i put >>heavy i/o on the linear array cited before. >> >> > >You don't say what the problems are. Can you provide more details? > >Is it ONLY on the linear array? > > Hi, Sorry i've not clarified it on my post to linux-raid, only to lkml[0].I've seen two oops and the kernel BUG (posted to lkml), and already comented here by Christoph, only when i run the rsync clients against the rsync server running on this machine storing files on a linear array. I can try to reproduce it again to post the oops (one using xfs and the later with ext3) here, but i was hoping that someone have already hit that. By the way...Christoph can you give more details about that patch? Was it merged on some kernel already released, i haven't checked it. Isn't strange that a similar problem can be seen using ext3? FYI, at the moment i'm running on a partition without raid linear, only xfs and in two days i'll report if the heavy i/o load breaks it again or not. It seems that i've reached more than one bug through this process. [0] = http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0404.1/0706.html Thanks again, Gustavo Franco