From: Sevatio <sevatio@atella.com>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Hard drive Reliability?
Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 08:51:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40ACD3FD.2090509@atella.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200405200140.26636.maarten@vbvb.nl>
> One thing I've come to believe over the years is that heat is a very important
> factor that's killing drives. So I now take great care in ensuring good heat
> dissipation from the drives. This entails amongst others that you should
> never 'sandwich' drives in their 3,5" slots (I can't believe case
> manufacturers still have not woken up to this need!). Instead I often arrange
> for them to go in 5,25" slots so they have plenty of air around. If I need to
> put them in 3,5" slots I always leave 1 unit space around a drive.
> In the servers I deploy I take bigger measures, like a bigass 120mm fan just
> in front of the drives (accomplished either by dremel or by case design)
>
> Maarten
>
I employ the same methods now by mounting harddrives in the 5.25" bays
and placing fans in front of them. HDs that are sandwiched together in
the 3.5" bays get too hot to touch whereas fanned 5.25" HDs are barely
above room temperature. This seemed to have helped. I haven't had a
failure of a HD that's mounted in this manner yet (these have run 24x7
for the last 1.5years). I've even seen HD heatsink kits. It all boils
down to the extreme tight margins that hardware mfgs operate. They're
forced cut corners where possible. We just need to be as informed as
possible and intelligently vote with our wallets.
Sevatio
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-20 15:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-19 19:58 Hard drive Reliability? John Lange
2004-05-19 20:49 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-05-19 21:28 ` Sevatio
2004-05-19 22:02 ` John Lange
2004-05-19 22:42 ` jim
2004-05-19 22:26 ` Guy
2004-05-19 23:53 ` maarten van den Berg
2004-05-20 0:49 ` TJ Harrell
2004-05-20 1:13 ` berk walker
2004-05-20 6:39 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-05-19 23:44 ` maarten van den Berg
2004-05-19 22:04 ` berk walker
2004-05-19 22:18 ` Guy
2004-05-19 23:40 ` maarten van den Berg
2004-05-20 0:34 ` Guy
2004-05-20 1:46 ` John Lange
2004-05-20 22:27 ` Russ Price
2004-05-20 15:51 ` Sevatio [this message]
2004-05-20 4:39 ` Mark Hahn
2004-05-20 7:15 ` John Lange
2004-05-20 12:15 ` Mark Hahn
2004-05-20 13:26 ` jim
2004-05-20 13:31 ` John Lange
2004-05-20 14:20 ` Mark Hahn
2004-05-20 13:32 ` Tim Grant
2004-05-20 14:38 ` Robin Bowes
2004-05-22 5:15 ` Brad Campbell
2004-05-24 13:25 ` Frank van Maarseveen
2004-05-24 18:35 ` Brad Campbell
2004-05-24 22:38 ` maarten van den Berg
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-05-20 13:54 Cress, Andrew R
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40ACD3FD.2090509@atella.com \
--to=sevatio@atella.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).