From: David Greaves <david@dgreaves.com>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Raid 5 questions
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2004 15:29:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40BF35D7.9050902@dgreaves.com> (raw)
Hi
I've perused the archives and read the docs but I'm not sure on this
point :)
If I create an array with 3 250Gb disks and use the 'missing' option I
should get a degraded raid5 array with 750Gb
Now, when another 250Gb disk arrives I want to add that as the missing
disk - will that work?
Now, since I actually have the 3 disks and I'm waiting for the 4th, lets
try it with 2 and add a third...
Clear out the superblocks so we're starting from scratch
cu:~# mdadm --stop /dev/md0
cu:~# mdadm --zero-superblock /dev/sda
cu:~# mdadm --zero-superblock /dev/sdb
cu:~# mdadm --zero-superblock /dev/sdc
Make the array.
cu:~# mdadm -v -C /dev/md0 --chunk=128 --level=5 --raid-devices=3
/dev/sda /dev/sdb missing
mdadm: layout defaults to left-symmetric
mdadm: size set to 245117312K
mdadm: array /dev/md0 started.
What have we got?
cu:~# mdadm --detail /dev/md0
/dev/md0:
Version : 00.90.01
Creation Time : Thu Jun 3 16:19:26 2004
Raid Level : raid5
Array Size : 490234624 (467.52 GiB 502.00 GB)
Device Size : 245117312 (233.76 GiB 251.00 GB)
Raid Devices : 3
Total Devices : 2
Preferred Minor : 0
Persistence : Superblock is persistent
Update Time : Thu Jun 3 16:19:26 2004
State : clean, no-errors
Active Devices : 2
Working Devices : 2
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 0
Layout : left-symmetric
Chunk Size : 128K
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
0 8 0 0 active sync /dev/sda
1 8 16 1 active sync /dev/sdb
2 0 0 -1 removed
UUID : 8acbe990:b31287f7:32888f7d:f0edcf0c
Events : 0.3887
Thats 2x 251Gb giving a 502Gb array - good
Add this to the config
cu:~# echo 'DEVICE /dev/sd[abcd]' >/etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf
cu:~# mdadm --detail --scan >>/etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf
cu:~# cat /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf
DEVICE /dev/sd[abcd]
ARRAY /dev/md0 level=raid5 num-devices=3
UUID=8acbe990:b31287f7:32888f7d:f0edcf0c
devices=/dev/sda,/dev/sdb
Now, the new disk arrives...
cu:~# mdadm /dev/md0 -a /dev/sdc
mdadm: hot added /dev/sdc
So it should be working fine...
cu:~# mdadm --detail /dev/md0
/dev/md0:
Version : 00.90.01
Creation Time : Thu Jun 3 16:19:26 2004
Raid Level : raid5
Array Size : 490234624 (467.52 GiB 502.00 GB)
Device Size : 245117312 (233.76 GiB 251.00 GB)
Raid Devices : 3
Total Devices : 3
Preferred Minor : 0
Persistence : Superblock is persistent
Update Time : Thu Jun 3 16:23:21 2004
State : clean, no-errors
Active Devices : 2
Working Devices : 3
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 1
Layout : left-symmetric
Chunk Size : 128K
Rebuild Status : 0% complete
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
0 8 0 0 active sync /dev/sda
1 8 16 1 active sync /dev/sdb
2 0 0 -1 removed
3 8 32 2 spare /dev/sdc
UUID : 8acbe990:b31287f7:32888f7d:f0edcf0c
Events : 0.3888
Nope it's a spare?
Help - how do I make my array resilient?
Environment:
Debian testing
Linux cu.dgreaves.com 2.6.6 #1 Thu Jun 3 14:12:01 BST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
mdadm - v1.5.0 - 22 Jan 2004
Thanks
David
next reply other threads:[~2004-06-03 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-03 14:29 David Greaves [this message]
2004-06-03 15:13 ` Raid 5 questions Guy
2004-06-03 15:50 ` David Greaves
2004-06-03 16:43 ` Guy
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-08-01 1:57 RAID " Ninti Systems
2004-08-01 3:08 ` Daniel Pittman
2004-08-01 3:31 ` Jim Paris
2004-08-01 3:50 ` Alvin Oga
2004-08-02 6:01 ` Jarmo Järvenpää
2004-08-02 6:08 ` Luca Berra
2004-08-02 6:55 ` Jarmo Järvenpää
2004-08-02 6:09 ` Jim Paris
2004-08-02 7:27 ` Jarmo Järvenpää
2004-08-03 20:23 ` Frank van Maarseveen
2004-08-04 8:52 ` Tim Small
2004-08-01 9:33 ` Luca Berra
2004-08-01 10:24 ` Frank van Maarseveen
2004-08-03 5:19 ` misty-
2004-08-06 0:49 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40BF35D7.9050902@dgreaves.com \
--to=david@dgreaves.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).