linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dieter Stueken <stueken@conterra.de>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Partition or whole disk ?
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 18:40:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40E2ED12.9020703@conterra.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1088604941.2840.1.camel@JubJub>

Josh Litherland wrote:
> Couldn't find an authoritative answer to this in the faq or elsewhere...
> Is it preferred to build md sets out of whole disks or of partitions ? 
> Is there any functional reason why either one is better ?

If you make partitions, about one track is is "wasted" to store
the useless partition table. Thus I used whole disks for a long time.

The problem might be, that "fdisk -l" won't show up if this
disk is an MD device. It shows an empty partition table which
may look like an unused/empty disk. If you create the partition
table, you may waste some data, but fdisk may show this is a
disk with a partition containing some MD data on it.

Meanwhile I turned back to make partition tables again,
just to "tag" the disk as "in use". If I put a new disk
into my system, it has no partition table. Thus I can verify
this condition, before I initialize the disk. This may prevent
me from accidentally initialize/destroying some disk in use,
which already has an partition table.

Dieter.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-06-30 16:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-06-30 14:15 Partition or whole disk ? Josh Litherland
2004-06-30 14:55 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2004-06-30  8:09   ` Ryan B. Lynch
2004-06-30 16:11   ` Guy
2004-06-30 16:40 ` Dieter Stueken [this message]
2004-07-01 17:15 ` Mark Hahn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=40E2ED12.9020703@conterra.de \
    --to=stueken@conterra.de \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).