From: Laurent CARON <lcaron@apartia.fr>
To: Wolfram Schlich <lists@wolfram.schlich.org>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RAID5] upgrading from kernel 2.4 to 2.6 considered safe?
Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2004 22:54:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40E86E8F.4090304@apartia.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040704193549.ALLYOURBASEAREBELONGTOUS.E10903@bla.fasel.org>
Wolfram Schlich wrote:
>Hi,
>
>is an upgrade from kernel 2.4 (2.4.22 currently) to 2.6 (e.g. 2.6.7)
>considered safe for a Linux software RAID with level 5?
>
>
yes,
no problem with it
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-04 20:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-04 19:35 [RAID5] upgrading from kernel 2.4 to 2.6 considered safe? Wolfram Schlich
2004-07-04 20:54 ` Laurent CARON [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40E86E8F.4090304@apartia.fr \
--to=lcaron@apartia.fr \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lists@wolfram.schlich.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).