From: Who Knows <quien-sabe@metaorg.com>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Okay, finally saved by RAID now what?
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 21:12:19 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40FC7F83.1080003@metaorg.com> (raw)
This morning going through my logs/mail I first noticed a down/up alert
from my http monitor. I rarely get them but it had been awhile.
Next browsing the daily logwatch report I saw that the server had
rebooted. Again although this is VERY rare, not unknown to happen, even
big data centers occasionaly have a power outage.
Further down in the log however, I saw that one of the two drives I had
configured in a RAID1 array didn't seem to be working as it was logging
errors and had been marked as failed when the array started on boot, but
despite the errors all the services seemed to be up and working, so I
patted myself on the back for deciding to deploy the server with
software RAID, and went for a second cup of coffee.
Upon returning I decided to figure out how to use the raidtools and shut
the bad drive down. Okay I know the HOWTO said to test it all when I
first set it up, but heck...I figured it would either work or not...and
it seems to have worked.
I read a couple of howto's and decided I needed to install mdadm. Then
following the procedures outlined I removed the two failing partitions
from /dev/md0 and /dev/md1 respectively. After this seemed successfully
done the number of hdc errors filling my log did diminish greatly, but I
still see a good many errors to the drive that is supposedly no longer a
member of either md.
The server has continued to degrade throughout the day however, as
xinetd and mysqld have both just died which has never happened before. I
was able to restart them, but of course now I am suspecting other issues
like a flaky powersupply.
My question here is, why is the disk still logging errors after being
removed from the two raid arrays.
Regards,
Jim
--
Helping Business Profit From Technology
http://www.aidant.net
next reply other threads:[~2004-07-20 2:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-20 2:12 Who Knows [this message]
2004-07-20 11:46 ` Okay, finally saved by RAID now what? Henrik Lewander
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40FC7F83.1080003@metaorg.com \
--to=quien-sabe@metaorg.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).