* Why do arrays start without some components? @ 2010-03-15 20:26 Simon Matthews 2010-03-15 21:04 ` Asdo 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Simon Matthews @ 2010-03-15 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-raid I have a couple of machines on which this is happening now -- When the machine boots, the RAID arrays (RAID 1) start, but each array only has one component device. I can add the other component again (using mdadm --add ... ) and the array will sync up, but next time it boots, I have to do the same once more. Why is this and how do I fix it? Simon ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Why do arrays start without some components? 2010-03-15 20:26 Why do arrays start without some components? Simon Matthews @ 2010-03-15 21:04 ` Asdo 2010-03-15 21:26 ` Simon Matthews 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Asdo @ 2010-03-15 21:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Simon Matthews; +Cc: linux-raid Simon Matthews wrote: > I have a couple of machines on which this is happening now -- > > When the machine boots, the RAID arrays (RAID 1) start, but each array > only has one component device. I can add the other component again > (using mdadm --add ... ) and the array will sync up, but next time it > boots, I have to do the same once more. > > Why is this and how do I fix it? > Might that be a /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf in the initramfs listing fewer devices than it should? I am not sure (because in this case maybe it shouldn't autoassemble the array at all), but have a look by unpacking your initramfs. If yes, update it. Or could that be a controller that shows the disks to the kernel too late... do you have multiple controllers? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Why do arrays start without some components? 2010-03-15 21:04 ` Asdo @ 2010-03-15 21:26 ` Simon Matthews 2010-03-16 5:34 ` Simon Matthews 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Simon Matthews @ 2010-03-15 21:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Asdo; +Cc: linux-raid On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Asdo <asdo@shiftmail.org> wrote: > Simon Matthews wrote: >> >> I have a couple of machines on which this is happening now -- >> >> When the machine boots, the RAID arrays (RAID 1) start, but each array >> only has one component device. I can add the other component again >> (using mdadm --add ... ) and the array will sync up, but next time it >> boots, I have to do the same once more. >> >> Why is this and how do I fix it? >> > > Might that be a /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf in the initramfs listing fewer devices > than it should? > I am not sure (because in this case maybe it shouldn't autoassemble the > array at all), but have a look by unpacking your initramfs. If yes, update > it. I don't have an initramfs. This is a Gentoo system and I built the kernel with all the drivers required to boot built in. This includes RAID support. > Or could that be a controller that shows the disks to the kernel too late... > do you have multiple controllers? I don't think so, on one machine they are SATA drives, but only one controller. But, perhaps on the other machine, this may be happening, since the drive that includes the component that is left out of the array is on an add-in controller. On this machine, the problematic array uses IDE drives for its components. Simon > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Why do arrays start without some components? 2010-03-15 21:26 ` Simon Matthews @ 2010-03-16 5:34 ` Simon Matthews 2010-03-16 8:08 ` Majed B. 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Simon Matthews @ 2010-03-16 5:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Asdo; +Cc: linux-raid On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Simon Matthews <simon.d.matthews@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Asdo <asdo@shiftmail.org> wrote: >> Simon Matthews wrote: >>> >>> I have a couple of machines on which this is happening now -- >>> >>> When the machine boots, the RAID arrays (RAID 1) start, but each array >>> only has one component device. I can add the other component again >>> (using mdadm --add ... ) and the array will sync up, but next time it >>> boots, I have to do the same once more. >>> >>> Why is this and how do I fix it? >>> >> >> Might that be a /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf in the initramfs listing fewer devices >> than it should? >> I am not sure (because in this case maybe it shouldn't autoassemble the >> array at all), but have a look by unpacking your initramfs. If yes, update >> it. > > I don't have an initramfs. This is a Gentoo system and I built the > kernel with all the drivers required to boot built in. This includes > RAID support. > >> Or could that be a controller that shows the disks to the kernel too late... >> do you have multiple controllers? > > I don't think so, on one machine they are SATA drives, but only one controller. > > But, perhaps on the other machine, this may be happening, since the > drive that includes the component that is left out of the array is on > an add-in controller. On this machine, the problematic array uses IDE > drives for its components. Replying to my own email -- bad form, I know. However, some additional information. The components that do form the degraded array on boot up on the all-SATA machine are all /dev/sdbX and the missing components are all /dev/sdaX. I think this makes it unlikely that the controller is showing the disks to the kernel too late, since I think it is likely that the /dev/sdaX disks are shown first. Simon ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Why do arrays start without some components? 2010-03-16 5:34 ` Simon Matthews @ 2010-03-16 8:08 ` Majed B. 2010-03-16 15:48 ` Simon Matthews 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Majed B. @ 2010-03-16 8:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: LinuxRaid If you are unable to access a certain disk, that disk has most likely failed. Also, did you change the partition types to "FD" (RAID Autodetect)? I once forgot to do that and that affected partition kept jumping out of the array. On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Simon Matthews <simon.d.matthews@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Simon Matthews > <simon.d.matthews@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Asdo <asdo@shiftmail.org> wrote: >>> Simon Matthews wrote: >>>> >>>> I have a couple of machines on which this is happening now -- >>>> >>>> When the machine boots, the RAID arrays (RAID 1) start, but each array >>>> only has one component device. I can add the other component again >>>> (using mdadm --add ... ) and the array will sync up, but next time it >>>> boots, I have to do the same once more. >>>> >>>> Why is this and how do I fix it? >>>> >>> >>> Might that be a /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf in the initramfs listing fewer devices >>> than it should? >>> I am not sure (because in this case maybe it shouldn't autoassemble the >>> array at all), but have a look by unpacking your initramfs. If yes, update >>> it. >> >> I don't have an initramfs. This is a Gentoo system and I built the >> kernel with all the drivers required to boot built in. This includes >> RAID support. >> >>> Or could that be a controller that shows the disks to the kernel too late... >>> do you have multiple controllers? >> >> I don't think so, on one machine they are SATA drives, but only one controller. >> >> But, perhaps on the other machine, this may be happening, since the >> drive that includes the component that is left out of the array is on >> an add-in controller. On this machine, the problematic array uses IDE >> drives for its components. > > Replying to my own email -- bad form, I know. However, some additional > information. The components that do form the degraded array on boot up > on the all-SATA machine are all /dev/sdbX and the missing components > are all /dev/sdaX. I think this makes it unlikely that the controller > is showing the disks to the kernel too late, since I think it is > likely that the /dev/sdaX disks are shown first. > > Simon > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- Majed B. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Why do arrays start without some components? 2010-03-16 8:08 ` Majed B. @ 2010-03-16 15:48 ` Simon Matthews 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Simon Matthews @ 2010-03-16 15:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Majed B.; +Cc: LinuxRaid On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 1:08 AM, Majed B. <majedb@gmail.com> wrote: > If you are unable to access a certain disk, that disk has most likely failed. No. I can add the partitions of the disk to the various RAID sets to which they belong. > > Also, did you change the partition types to "FD" (RAID Autodetect)? > I once forgot to do that and that affected partition kept jumping out > of the array. No. Partition types are correct. Simon ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-03-16 15:48 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2010-03-15 20:26 Why do arrays start without some components? Simon Matthews 2010-03-15 21:04 ` Asdo 2010-03-15 21:26 ` Simon Matthews 2010-03-16 5:34 ` Simon Matthews 2010-03-16 8:08 ` Majed B. 2010-03-16 15:48 ` Simon Matthews
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).