linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Hardy <mhardy@h3c.com>
To: Kanoa Withington <kanoa@cfht.hawaii.edu>
Cc: Huntress Gary B NPRI <HuntressGB@Npt.NUWC.Navy.Mil>,
	"'linux-raid@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: High System Load
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:54:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <41083CB6.9070901@h3c.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.55.0407281322170.17864@umi.cfht.hawaii.edu>


Even without DMA there should only ever be one kernel thread issuing 
instructions, resulting in a load of 1, which is all I've ever seen.

DMA vs. PIO modes will just result in a lower resync throughput, which 
you can watch with something like (you can even try using hdparm to 
change modes while the resync is happening to see the effect if you're 
brave):

#!/bin/tcsh
while 1
   cat /proc/mdstat
   sleep 1
   clear
end

There's got to be something else happening on the machine...

-Mike

Kanoa Withington wrote:
> There is a lot of activity after you first create a mirror but the CPU
> load should not be that high. Maybe you don't have DMA turned on?
> Check using "hdparm".
> 
> -Kanoa
> 
> On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, Huntress Gary B NPRI wrote:
> 
> 
>>Hi,
>>
>>I'm creating my first software RAID array.  I'm on a 900 MHz system with 786MB of ram, running Fedora RC1.  I'm creating a RAID 1 array consisting only of two drives, split on two IDE channels.
>>
>>I used mdadm --create and everything is running fine so far, but my system load is well over 10.   Is this normal?   I suspect that this is just overhead while creating the array the first time.   Can I assume that when the array is actually put into use that the system loads will not be this high?  (I hope not!)
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>Gary H.

  reply	other threads:[~2004-07-28 23:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-07-28 23:00 High System Load Huntress Gary B NPRI
2004-07-28 23:23 ` Kanoa Withington
2004-07-28 23:54   ` Mike Hardy [this message]
2004-07-29  0:17     ` Jim Paris

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=41083CB6.9070901@h3c.com \
    --to=mhardy@h3c.com \
    --cc=HuntressGB@Npt.NUWC.Navy.Mil \
    --cc=kanoa@cfht.hawaii.edu \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).