From: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Q: RAID-1 w/2x160GB, ReiserFS, Debian 'woody', homebrew 2.4.25 kernel
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 10:20:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4111FBF5.8000806@buttersideup.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87657ycaf9.fsf@enki.rimspace.net>
Daniel Pittman wrote:
>>see subject (Debian). I've looked at SuSE though, it seems with their setup RAID and ReiserFS is much easier to handle.
>>
>>
>The upcoming release of Debian will feature MD and LVM device creation
>at install time, but is not yet stable; the current stable release does
>not support either of them.
>
>
Sarge is pretty good at the moment (at least I am running production
systems on it, and have been for the last few months) - the disadvantage
of installing a new Woody system now is that security updates for it
will probably stop before it's reached the end of it's useful life. Of
course, as it's Debian, you should be able to upgrade to Sarge
relatively painlessly, but I'd probably rather avoid the hassle, and go
straight to Sarge now. I think Debian Installer currently includes
support for installing Sarge directly onto md mirrors (including
handling the boot-loader stuff), but I haven't tried it yet... Might be
worth trying one of the daily builds from:
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
The disadvantage of installing Sarge yet is that it won't go through the
official security updates until it is released, but in the mean time,
you can pull security-fixes in from unstable (using apt-pinning if you
like) - sounds nasty but it seems to work quite well in practice. Sorry
for getting distribution-centric on the list!
Tim.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-05 9:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-04 8:42 Q: RAID-1 w/2x160GB, ReiserFS, Debian "woody", homebrew 2.4.25 kernel Jens Benecke
2004-08-04 9:00 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2004-08-04 11:10 ` Jens Benecke
2004-08-04 12:25 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2004-08-04 12:32 ` Tim Small
2004-08-04 10:00 ` Q: RAID-1 w/2x160GB, ReiserFS, Debian 'woody', " Robin Bowes
2004-08-04 10:29 ` Mark Watts
2004-08-04 10:34 ` Tim Small
2004-08-04 10:37 ` Robin Bowes
2004-08-04 11:12 ` Alvin Oga
2004-08-04 23:51 ` Mark Hahn
2004-08-05 6:16 ` Jens Benecke
2004-08-05 7:26 ` Daniel Pittman
2004-08-05 9:20 ` Tim Small [this message]
2004-08-05 12:02 ` Jens Benecke
2004-08-05 9:57 ` robin-lists
2004-08-05 12:08 ` Jens Benecke
2004-08-05 12:38 ` Mark Watts
2004-08-05 12:49 ` Katarina WONG
2004-08-05 15:42 ` robin-lists
2004-08-04 10:28 ` Q: RAID-1 w/2x160GB, ReiserFS, Debian "woody", " Tim Small
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4111FBF5.8000806@buttersideup.com \
--to=tim@buttersideup.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).