* journaling raidreconf status?
@ 2004-08-12 6:27 Mike Baynton
2004-08-12 8:05 ` Brad Campbell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mike Baynton @ 2004-08-12 6:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
Just politely asking where development of the raidreconf that can
semi-gracefully deal with power failures (discussed in
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-raid&m=108287727504009&w=2 ) is,
it would be pretty significant to my situation (home system with no
power backup and no way to back up 100% of my stuff.)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: journaling raidreconf status?
2004-08-12 6:27 journaling raidreconf status? Mike Baynton
@ 2004-08-12 8:05 ` Brad Campbell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Brad Campbell @ 2004-08-12 8:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mike Baynton; +Cc: linux-raid
Mike Baynton wrote:
> Just politely asking where development of the raidreconf that can
> semi-gracefully deal with power failures (discussed in
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-raid&m=108287727504009&w=2 ) is,
> it would be pretty significant to my situation (home system with no
> power backup and no way to back up 100% of my stuff.)
It's paused while I save up for a couple of new hard disks. One took a dive onto a tiled floor and 2
days ago one of the others chucked a serious wobbly with SMART telling me that it can't write data
to the media.
It's on my list although at the moment I'm spending most of my time looking at
integrating/interfacing raidreconf with mdadm to get it away from raidtools.
raid-6 support, > 2TB and mdadm integration are my priorities at the moment.
I did manage to resize a 1.6TB raid-5 into a 2.2TB raid-5 a while back, but then I also had a full 7
drive tar backup of the array so I was not that concerened about power failures.
I have also added off-line parity block checking/reconstruction to the todo list for both raid-5 and
raid-6 as I figure if we could build the parity blocks as part of the reconf and then boot into a
completely clean new raid it is a bit safer in the long run. (Plus I'd like to be able to take my
array offline and do a parity block integrity check while doing a read test of every sector of every
drive, that way if one drive has a read error or two, we may be able to force a reallocation on that
disk and re-write that block with recreated data)
Don't get too excited though as I'm struggling just getting raid-6 and mdadm support happening at
the moment (time and all that)
Regards,
Brad
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-08-12 8:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-08-12 6:27 journaling raidreconf status? Mike Baynton
2004-08-12 8:05 ` Brad Campbell
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).