From: adfas asd <chimera_god@yahoo.com>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: Remote NAS
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 07:07:30 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41943.20139.qm@web38801.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090927201849401.FXKG6584@cdptpa-omta02.mail.rr.com>
I am puzzled by why write-mostly. Ostensibly Gb ethernet is supposed to nearly equal the data transfer rate of the controller cards, and be many times the speed of actual data transfer from the drives.
So shouldn't a NAS have plenty of bandwidth to accommodate most any drive operations?
I will be setting up a small high-perf drive for / (including database) so the only data on the array will be /home (including large videos).
Seems like there is no need to specify write-mostly?
--- On Sun, 9/27/09, Leslie Rhorer <lrhorer@satx.rr.com> wrote:
> In his situation (assuming he doesn't
> take my advice and separate
> the remote system entirely), wouldn't he be better served
> to create a RAIDn
> array on both systems and then create a RAID1 from the
> local and NAS array
> with the write mostly option?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-28 14:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-22 19:38 Remote NAS adfas asd
2009-09-22 20:09 ` Robin Hill
2009-09-22 21:56 ` adfas asd
2009-09-23 7:57 ` Robin Hill
2009-09-23 9:13 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2009-09-23 14:59 ` adfas asd
2009-09-23 21:01 ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2009-09-23 22:58 ` adfas asd
2009-09-23 14:52 ` adfas asd
2009-09-23 15:29 ` Robin Hill
2009-09-23 15:44 ` adfas asd
2009-09-23 16:10 ` Robin Hill
2009-09-27 20:19 ` Leslie Rhorer
2009-09-28 14:07 ` adfas asd [this message]
2009-09-28 14:15 ` Thomas Fjellstrom
2009-09-29 14:40 ` adfas asd
2009-09-29 9:25 ` Leslie Rhorer
2009-09-27 20:44 ` Leslie Rhorer
2009-09-27 22:00 ` Leslie Rhorer
2009-09-29 14:15 ` adfas asd
2009-09-30 15:36 ` Leslie Rhorer
[not found] <228497.14504.qm@web38801.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
2009-09-29 10:09 ` Leslie Rhorer
[not found] <20090923200257.GA19027@cthulhu.home.robinhill.me.uk>
2009-09-23 23:08 ` adfas asd
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-09-16 16:21 adfas asd
2009-09-27 19:39 ` Leslie Rhorer
2009-09-27 20:09 ` Leslie Rhorer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41943.20139.qm@web38801.mail.mud.yahoo.com \
--to=chimera_god@yahoo.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).