* mdadm safe for all versions ?
@ 2004-11-17 9:27 peter.greis
2004-11-17 9:40 ` David Greaves
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: peter.greis @ 2004-11-17 9:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
Morning All,
Perhaps you all could clear this up for me... I have mdadm 1.5 installed (from an RPM) on SuSE 9.1 (now running kernel 2.6.8.1). Is it safe to back out 1.5 and install 1.8x from source, or does this require a kernel upgrade ?
regards,
-Peter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: mdadm safe for all versions ?
2004-11-17 9:27 mdadm safe for all versions ? peter.greis
@ 2004-11-17 9:40 ` David Greaves
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Greaves @ 2004-11-17 9:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: peter.greis; +Cc: linux-raid
peter.greis@ubs.com wrote:
>Morning All,
>
>Perhaps you all could clear this up for me... I have mdadm 1.5 installed (from an RPM) on SuSE 9.1 (now running kernel 2.6.8.1). Is it safe to back out 1.5 and install 1.8x from source, or does this require a kernel upgrade ?
>
Hi Peter
Neil's last mdadm announcment (about 1.8.1 on 5 Nov) said:
This is a "development" release of mdadm. It should *not* be
considered stable and should be used primarily for testing.
The current "stable" version is 1.8.0.
And it won't need a kernel upgrade.
David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-11-17 9:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-11-17 9:27 mdadm safe for all versions ? peter.greis
2004-11-17 9:40 ` David Greaves
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).