linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brad Campbell <brad@wasp.net.au>
To: Stephan van Hienen <raid@a2000.nu>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: raid5 code ok with 2TB + ?
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 14:57:48 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <41A9AF2C.5010706@wasp.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0411281146490.17548@adsl.a2000.nu>

Stephan van Hienen wrote:
> in the past the raid5 code was 32bits internal
> and the limit was 2TB
> 
> is this fixed in the 2.6.x ?

I hope so, I have been using it on a 2.2TB raid-5 for months now. (I have completely filled the 
partition and e2fsck it monthly so I would hope any glitches should have surfaced by now)

brad@srv:~$ cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid0] [raid5] [raid6]
md2 : active raid5 sdl[0] sdm[2] sdk[1]
       488396800 blocks level 5, 128k chunk, algorithm 2 [3/3] [UUU]

md0 : active raid5 sda1[0] sdj1[9] sdi1[8] sdh1[7] sdg1[6] sdf1[5] sde1[4] sdd1[3] sdc1[2] sdb1[1]
       2206003968 blocks level 5, 128k chunk, algorithm 0 [10/10] [UUUUUUUUUU]


-- 
Brad
                    /"\
Save the Forests   \ /     ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
Burn a Greenie.     X      AGAINST HTML MAIL
                    / \

  reply	other threads:[~2004-11-28 10:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-11-28 10:48 raid5 code ok with 2TB + ? Stephan van Hienen
2004-11-28 10:57 ` Brad Campbell [this message]
2004-11-28 11:19   ` Stephan van Hienen
2004-11-28 11:28     ` Brad Campbell
2004-11-28 18:19   ` Guy
2004-11-28 19:20     ` Brad Campbell
2004-11-28 20:17       ` raid5 code ok with 2TB + ? NEGATIVE :( Stephan van Hienen
2004-11-28 20:27         ` Stephan van Hienen
2004-11-28 20:45           ` Stephan van Hienen
2004-11-28 23:34             ` raid5 code ok with 2TB + ? Stephan van Hienen
2004-11-29  4:49               ` Guy
2004-11-29  8:33                 ` Stephan van Hienen
2004-11-29  8:51                   ` raid5 slow Stephan van Hienen
2004-11-29 17:13                     ` Guy
2004-11-29 18:11                       ` Stephan van Hienen
2004-11-30  0:06                         ` raid5 slow (looks like 2.6 problem) Stephan van Hienen
2004-11-30  0:30                     ` raid5 slow Neil Brown
2004-11-30  0:50                       ` Stephan van Hienen
2004-11-30 19:37                         ` Stephan van Hienen
2004-11-30 23:26                           ` Neil Brown
2004-11-30 23:39                             ` Stephan van Hienen
2004-11-30 23:55                             ` Stephan van Hienen
2004-12-01 19:23                               ` raid5 slow (test on another system) Stephan van Hienen
2004-12-01 22:21                                 ` Stephan van Hienen
2004-12-02 22:01                                   ` Stephan van Hienen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=41A9AF2C.5010706@wasp.net.au \
    --to=brad@wasp.net.au \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=raid@a2000.nu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).