linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brad Campbell <brad@wasp.net.au>
To: Stephan van Hienen <raid@a2000.nu>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: raid5 code ok with 2TB + ?
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 15:28:25 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <41A9B659.2080703@wasp.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0411281215310.17548@adsl.a2000.nu>

Stephan van Hienen wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Nov 2004, Brad Campbell wrote:
> 
>> I hope so, I have been using it on a 2.2TB raid-5 for months now. (I 
>> have completely filled the partition and e2fsck it monthly so I would 
>> hope any glitches should have surfaced by now)
> 
> 
> ok looks ok
> when i tried 2.3TB last year it failed within a few days (data written 
> to the 2TB+ was written to the first part (0-0.3TB)
> 
> btw which filesystem are you using ?
> (and which stripesize?)

Ext3 and ...

brad@srv:~$ sudo mdadm --misc --detail /dev/md0
/dev/md0:
         Version : 00.90.01
   Creation Time : Sun May  2 18:02:14 2004
      Raid Level : raid5
      Array Size : 2206003968 (2103.81 GiB 2258.95 GB)
     Device Size : 245111552 (233.76 GiB 250.99 GB)
    Raid Devices : 10
   Total Devices : 10
Preferred Minor : 0
     Persistence : Superblock is persistent

     Update Time : Sun Nov 28 06:44:04 2004
           State : clean
  Active Devices : 10
Working Devices : 10
  Failed Devices : 0
   Spare Devices : 0

          Layout : left-asymmetric
      Chunk Size : 128K

            UUID : 05cc3f43:de1ecfa4:83a51293:78015f1e
          Events : 0.1031147

     Number   Major   Minor   RaidDevice State
        0       8        1        0      active sync   /dev/devfs/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part1
        1       8       17        1      active sync   /dev/devfs/scsi/host1/bus0/target0/lun0/part1
        2       8       33        2      active sync   /dev/devfs/scsi/host2/bus0/target0/lun0/part1
        3       8       49        3      active sync   /dev/devfs/scsi/host3/bus0/target0/lun0/part1
        4       8       65        4      active sync   /dev/devfs/scsi/host4/bus0/target0/lun0/part1
        5       8       81        5      active sync   /dev/devfs/scsi/host5/bus0/target0/lun0/part1
        6       8       97        6      active sync   /dev/devfs/scsi/host6/bus0/target0/lun0/part1
        7       8      113        7      active sync   /dev/devfs/scsi/host7/bus0/target0/lun0/part1
        8       8      129        8      active sync   /dev/sdi1
        9       8      145        9      active sync   /dev/sdj1

-- 
Brad
                    /"\
Save the Forests   \ /     ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
Burn a Greenie.     X      AGAINST HTML MAIL
                    / \

  reply	other threads:[~2004-11-28 11:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-11-28 10:48 raid5 code ok with 2TB + ? Stephan van Hienen
2004-11-28 10:57 ` Brad Campbell
2004-11-28 11:19   ` Stephan van Hienen
2004-11-28 11:28     ` Brad Campbell [this message]
2004-11-28 18:19   ` Guy
2004-11-28 19:20     ` Brad Campbell
2004-11-28 20:17       ` raid5 code ok with 2TB + ? NEGATIVE :( Stephan van Hienen
2004-11-28 20:27         ` Stephan van Hienen
2004-11-28 20:45           ` Stephan van Hienen
2004-11-28 23:34             ` raid5 code ok with 2TB + ? Stephan van Hienen
2004-11-29  4:49               ` Guy
2004-11-29  8:33                 ` Stephan van Hienen
2004-11-29  8:51                   ` raid5 slow Stephan van Hienen
2004-11-29 17:13                     ` Guy
2004-11-29 18:11                       ` Stephan van Hienen
2004-11-30  0:06                         ` raid5 slow (looks like 2.6 problem) Stephan van Hienen
2004-11-30  0:30                     ` raid5 slow Neil Brown
2004-11-30  0:50                       ` Stephan van Hienen
2004-11-30 19:37                         ` Stephan van Hienen
2004-11-30 23:26                           ` Neil Brown
2004-11-30 23:39                             ` Stephan van Hienen
2004-11-30 23:55                             ` Stephan van Hienen
2004-12-01 19:23                               ` raid5 slow (test on another system) Stephan van Hienen
2004-12-01 22:21                                 ` Stephan van Hienen
2004-12-02 22:01                                   ` Stephan van Hienen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=41A9B659.2080703@wasp.net.au \
    --to=brad@wasp.net.au \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=raid@a2000.nu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).