linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brad Campbell <brad@wasp.net.au>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Cc: RAID Linux <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: "Rebuild" speed on a forced resync
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 22:34:02 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <41E8109A.7000603@wasp.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16868.28778.598528.338592@cse.unsw.edu.au>

Neil Brown wrote:
> On Tuesday January 11, brad@wasp.net.au wrote:
> 
>>G'day all,
>>
>>Just started my big raid using mdadm --update resync to ensure the parity blocks are A-OK after a 
>>kernel panic, and I have been monitoring my Disk IO with
>>iostat -k 5
>>
>>Now this is an average for a 5 second period.
>>I note I'm seeing about 12,456 Kilobytes/sec from each drive, but a cat /proc mdstat is giving me 
>>6716 Kilobytes/sec. Given I'm doing a read consistency check I would expect an mdstat speed 9/10ths 
>>of my bulk per-drive read speed. (This array is sda -> sdj)
>>Am I missing something really obvious?

>>
>>avg-cpu:  %user   %nice    %sys %iowait   %idle
>>           39.18    0.00   60.82    0.00    0.00
>>
>>Device:            tps    kB_read/s    kB_wrtn/s    kB_read    kB_wrtn
>>hda               0.00         0.00         0.00          0          0
>>sda              97.76     12465.67         0.00      33408          0
>>sdb              97.76     12465.67         0.00      33408          0
>>sdc              97.76     12465.67         0.00      33408          0
> 
> 
> So this is a 5 second sample...
> In 5 seconds, 33408 kB were read.
> That's 6681.6 kB/sec according to my calculator.
> 
> So it looks like iostat is reporting something wrongly.  I would look
> there first.

Ok, fair call on those stats. Having said that, we are talking 6.6 MB/sec per disk. Do I take it the 
/proc/mdstat figure of 6 MB/sec is not a total array rebuild speed, but a speed per array member?

Regards,
Brad

  reply	other threads:[~2005-01-14 18:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-01-11  9:47 "Rebuild" speed on a forced resync Brad Campbell
2005-01-12  0:33 ` Neil Brown
2005-01-14 18:34   ` Brad Campbell [this message]
2005-01-12  0:48 ` Guy
2005-01-12  4:31   ` Brad Campbell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=41E8109A.7000603@wasp.net.au \
    --to=brad@wasp.net.au \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).