linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Clements <paul.clements@steeleye.com>
To: Markus Gehring <markus.gehring@infinia.de>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, anders@anduras.de, nicoya@ubb.ca
Subject: Re: RAID1 Corruption
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 14:14:07 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <41EC0E7F.5090303@steeleye.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41EC0371.9060106@infinia.de>

Hi,

Markus Gehring wrote:

> I have a reproducable problem with corrupted data read from a RAID1-array.
> 
> Setup:
>  HW:
>   2 S-ATA-Disks (160GB each) -> /dev/md4 RAID1
>   Promise S150 TX4 - Controller
>   AMD Sempron 2200+
> 
>  SW:
>   Fedora Core 3
>   Kernel 2.6.10 unpatched
>   Samba (for read/write-accesses)
>   SW-Raid
> 
> Everything works fine with only one drive in the array. If the second is
> synced up read accesses return corrupted data.
> 
> Interesting: If you remove again the second disk. The same files will be
>  read correctly again (no matter if written while only one disk is in
> the array or two are synced!)!

This makes it sound like bad data is getting written to the second disk 
during resync. Could you give more details about your test procedure (a 
script or list of steps that reproduces the problem would be great)?

I don't think samba is the culprit, but just to be sure, is there any 
chance you could reproduce the problem without samba in the equation? 
(From what you say above, I assume all reads and writes are coming from 
a samba client of some sort?)

Thanks,
Paul

  reply	other threads:[~2005-01-17 19:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-01-17 15:22 RAID1 & 2.6.9 performance problem Janusz Zamecki
2005-01-17 15:39 ` Gordon Henderson
2005-01-17 15:51   ` Hans Kristian Rosbach
2005-01-17 16:46     ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-18 13:18       ` Hans Kristian Rosbach
2005-01-18 13:43         ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-01-17 20:49     ` Janusz Zamecki
2005-01-17 16:24   ` Andrew Walrond
2005-01-17 16:51     ` Is this hdparm -t output correct? (was Re: RAID1 & 2.6.9 performance problem) Andy Smith
2005-01-17 17:04       ` Andrew Walrond
2005-01-17 18:26         ` RAID1 Corruption Markus Gehring
2005-01-17 19:14           ` Paul Clements [this message]
2005-01-17 19:35             ` Tony Mantler
2005-01-17 19:42             ` Markus Gehring
2005-01-17 19:21           ` Sven Anders
2005-01-18 17:32 ` RAID1 & 2.6.9 performance problem J. Ryan Earl
2005-01-18 17:34   ` J. Ryan Earl
2005-01-18 18:41     ` Janusz Zamecki
2005-01-18 19:18       ` J. Ryan Earl
2005-01-18 19:34         ` Janusz Zamecki
2005-01-18 19:12   ` Janusz Zamecki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=41EC0E7F.5090303@steeleye.com \
    --to=paul.clements@steeleye.com \
    --cc=anders@anduras.de \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=markus.gehring@infinia.de \
    --cc=nicoya@ubb.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).