From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [OT] best tape backup system?
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 21:28:31 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <421CCB4F.2020301@tls.msk.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200502230126.j1N1Q5923933@www.watkins-home.com>
Guy wrote:
> I know a thing or 2 about SCSI. I know I had it correct. 1 config was all
> wide LVD (2940U2W). My card has a LVD and a SE port on the same logical
> SCSI bus.
I was surprized once when I noticied such "logical SCSI bus" really isn't
"logical" per se. I mean, if I plug ANY device into the "SE port", all
devices, including the ones attached to "LVD port" switches to SE mode.
Another channel - yes, sure, but not another port (connector) on the
same channel. Well, I can't say for all vendors and all cards, but the
ones we have here (mostly adaptec and ncr/sym) works this way. For example,
Adaptec AHA-3940U2x controller: it's 2-channel card with 3 ports, two
68pin LVD/SE (one per channel) and one older "scsi-like-ide" connector
attached to 1st channel -- any device attached to this last connector
forces the whole 1st channel to go into SE mode, and no LVD-only device
works (in fact, it does not work at all in this case with any LVD-only
device attached).
> Another config was wide LVD disks and a narrow SE tape. Another,
> my disks support SE, I had all SE wide and narrow. Correct terminators in
> each case. I also tried a 2940UW, no LVD, all SE. All configs worked if I
> only used the disks or the tape drives, but failed if I used disks and tape
> at the same time.
Well, this is weird. We have numerous configurations with mixed tapes and
disks (and other stuff) and had no single problem so far, everything just
works (except of that obvious LVD vs SE issue). Including 2940UW and other
controllers.
/mjt
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-23 18:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-22 10:28 [OT] best tape backup system? Louis-David Mitterrand
2005-02-22 11:05 ` Lajber Zoltan
2005-02-22 15:41 ` Gordon Henderson
2005-02-22 16:50 ` Guy
2005-02-22 17:40 ` Gordon Henderson
2005-02-22 21:39 ` Guy
2005-02-22 21:52 ` Michael Tokarev
2005-02-23 1:26 ` Guy
2005-02-23 18:28 ` Michael Tokarev [this message]
2005-02-23 19:46 ` Guy
2005-02-22 22:07 ` Jon Lewis
2005-02-22 22:13 ` Alvin Oga
2005-02-22 22:36 ` Jon Lewis
2005-02-22 22:48 ` David Dougall
2005-02-26 22:40 ` Mark Hahn
2005-02-26 23:09 ` berk walker
2005-02-22 23:00 ` Alvin Oga
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=421CCB4F.2020301@tls.msk.ru \
--to=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).