From: Brad Campbell <brad@wasp.net.au>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
RAID Linux <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Raid-6 hang on write.
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 09:34:01 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4223FEC9.8070306@wasp.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16930.45319.682534.351648@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Neil Brown wrote:
> On Friday February 25, brad@wasp.net.au wrote:
>
>>Turning on debugging in raid6main.c and md.c make it much harder to hit. So I'm assuming something
>>timing related.
>>
>>raid6d --> md_check_recovery --> generic_make_request --> make_request --> get_active_stripe
>
>
> Yes, there is a real problem here. I see if I can figure out the best
> way to remedy it...
> However I think you reported this problem against a non "-mm" kernel,
> and the path from md_check_recovery to generic_make_requests only
> exists in "-mm".
>
> Could you please confirm if there is a problem with
> 2.6.11-rc4-bk4->bk10
There is (was). I have three kernels I was testing against. 2.6.11-rc4-bk4, 2.6.11-rc4-bk10 and
2.6.11-rc4-mm1. I moved onto 2.6.11-rc4-mm1 for my main debugging (inserting lots of printks and
generally doing stuff that was going to crash). I hope to reproduce the faults against the vanilla
2.6.11-rc4 kernels and I'm now testing with 2.6.11-rc5-bk2.
As per the original bug report, 2.6.11-rc4-bk(4/10) locked in [<c0268574>]
get_active_stripe+0x224/0x260. Although unlike -mm1 I'm not sure of the sequence of events that
caused it and it's not anywhere as easy to hit. I am willing to investigate as time allows however.
Testing 2.6.11-rc5-bk2 and it of course is flatly refusing to misbehave. I'll keep beating on it for
a couple of days and after writing 3TB with 2.6.11-rc5-bk2, I'll go back to the older kernels and
try and reproduce the failure there. It *did* lockup 4 times in a row in get_active_stripe on the
older non -mm kernels.
Regards,
Brad
--
"Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability
to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable
for their apparent disinclination to do so." -- Douglas Adams
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-01 5:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-24 14:50 Raid-6 hang on write Brad Campbell
2005-02-25 15:37 ` Brad Campbell
2005-02-28 5:49 ` Neil Brown
2005-03-01 5:34 ` Brad Campbell [this message]
2005-03-01 6:58 ` Brad Campbell
2005-03-01 9:18 ` Neil Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4223FEC9.8070306@wasp.net.au \
--to=brad@wasp.net.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).