linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicola Fankhauser <nicola.fankhauser@variant.ch>
To: RAID Linux <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: non-optimal RAID 5 performance with 8 drive array
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 14:24:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42246D1F.3070407@variant.ch> (raw)

Hi all

I have a RAID 5 array consisting of 8 300GB Maxtor SATA drives 
(6B300S0), hooked up to a Asus A8N-SLI deluxe motherboard with 4 NForce4 
SATA ports and 4 SiI 3114 ports.

see [3] for a description of what I did and more details.

each single disk in the array gives a read performance (tested with dd) 
of about 62MB/s (when reading the first 4GiB of a disk).

the array (reading the first 8GiB from /dev/md0 with dd, bs=1024K) 
performs at about 174MiB/s, accessing the array through LVM2 (still with 
bs=1024K) only 86MiB/s.

my first conclusion was to leave out the LVM2 of the loop and directly 
put a file system on /dev/md0.

however, when reading Neil Brown's article [1], I got the impression 
that my system should perform better, given the fact that each disk has 
a transfer rate of minimally 37MiB/s, maximally 65MiB/s [2].

or is there a flaw in my argumentation and the current performance is 
normal? are at last the controllers saturating?

any suggestions are welcome.

regards
nicola

[1]: http://cgi.cse.unsw.edu.au/~neilb/01102979338
[2]: http://www.storagereview.com/articles/200410/200410087B300S0-2_2.html
[3]: http://variant.ch/phpwiki/WikiBlog/2005-02-27

             reply	other threads:[~2005-03-01 13:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-01 13:24 Nicola Fankhauser [this message]
2005-03-01 17:53 ` non-optimal RAID 5 performance with 8 drive array Robin Bowes
2005-03-01 18:04   ` Roberto Fichera
2005-03-01 18:12     ` Robin Bowes
2005-03-01 18:41       ` Roberto Fichera
2005-03-02 23:08         ` dd with bytes/sec patch [was: non-optimal RAID 5 performance with 8 drive array] Tim Moore
2005-03-04 22:23 ` non-optimal RAID 5 performance with 8 drive array Matthias Julius
2005-03-06 14:25 ` Stephan van Hienen
2005-03-06 14:43   ` Nicola Fankhauser
2005-03-06 17:09     ` Stephan van Hienen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42246D1F.3070407@variant.ch \
    --to=nicola.fankhauser@variant.ch \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).