* dd version I used is 5.2.1, but...
@ 2005-03-01 19:54 Nicola Fankhauser
2005-03-02 7:45 ` Jurriaan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Nicola Fankhauser @ 2005-03-01 19:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
hi
the version of dd I used is 5.2.1 (debian testing), but does anybody
have an idea regarding my performance question?
regards
nicola
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: dd version I used is 5.2.1, but...
2005-03-01 19:54 dd version I used is 5.2.1, but Nicola Fankhauser
@ 2005-03-02 7:45 ` Jurriaan
2005-03-02 9:43 ` Nicola Fankhauser
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jurriaan @ 2005-03-02 7:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nicola Fankhauser; +Cc: linux-raid
From: Nicola Fankhauser <nicola.fankhauser@variant.ch>
Date: Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 08:54:25PM +0100
> hi
>
> the version of dd I used is 5.2.1 (debian testing), but does anybody
> have an idea regarding my performance question?
>
- please group messages in the same thread, thank you.
- if there is no answer within a day, wait some more - not everybody is
constantly reading this list, you know.
- wrt your question: how are those raid-controllers on your motherboard?
If they are all connected through a single pci-bus, the speed is
reasonable. The best way to test if it's your motherboard or your
raid, is to start multiple dd processes on different disks, or
multiple bonnie++ processes on different disks, all concurrently, of
course.
Good luck,
Jurriaan
--
Never forget: 2 + 2 = 5 for extremely large values of 2.
Debian (Unstable) GNU/Linux 2.6.11-rc3-mm1 2x4734 bogomips load 0.71
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: dd version I used is 5.2.1, but...
2005-03-02 7:45 ` Jurriaan
@ 2005-03-02 9:43 ` Nicola Fankhauser
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Nicola Fankhauser @ 2005-03-02 9:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
hi
Jurriaan wrote:
> - please group messages in the same thread, thank you.
sorry for that.
> - if there is no answer within a day, wait some more - not everybody is
> constantly reading this list, you know.
thanks for the tip.
> - wrt your question: how are those raid-controllers on your motherboard?
actually, I could not find very much info about this. all I know is:
1. the SiI 3114 chip is (by specification of the chip, found at SiI's
site) connected by a PCI bus, 32bit wide, at 66mhz. however, I don't
know whether Asus chose to connect it at 33mhz. lspci says it's 66mhz,
but is this information trustworthy? nvidia tech specs of nforce4 sli
(the chipset I have) says its PCI bridges are 33mhz only [1].
2. the nforce4 sata ports are (to my knowledge) directly connected to
the nforce4 chipset.
> If they are all connected through a single pci-bus, the speed is
> reasonable. The best way to test if it's your motherboard or your
> raid, is to start multiple dd processes on different disks, or
> multiple bonnie++ processes on different disks, all concurrently, of
> course.
good idea (thought about it too). results of concurrent reads on all
eight drives show that the nforce4 sata ports perform quite well at
211MiB/s (52MiB/s per drive), however the SiI 3114 seemed to saturate at
129MiB/s (32MiB/s per drive). added, this gives at total throughput of
340MB/s.
non-concurrent dd gives for both controllers values seemingly bound by
drive performance of 60MiB/s.
thanks & regards
nicola
[1]: http://nvidia.com/page/pg_20041015917263.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-03-02 9:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-03-01 19:54 dd version I used is 5.2.1, but Nicola Fankhauser
2005-03-02 7:45 ` Jurriaan
2005-03-02 9:43 ` Nicola Fankhauser
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).