From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: berk walker Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] md bitmap bug fixes Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 15:29:15 -0500 Message-ID: <423C8B9B.60808@panix.com> References: <20050319162443.GR18819@marowsky-bree.de> <200503191744.j2JHiKT25357@www.watkins-home.com> <20050319175417.GU18819@marowsky-bree.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE In-Reply-To: <20050319175417.GU18819@marowsky-bree.de> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Lars Marowsky-Bree Cc: Guy , "'Peter T. Breuer'" , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: >On 2005-03-19T12:44:14, Guy wrote: > > =20 > >>In the case of a split brain, I think one must be 100% voided, and a = full >>re-sync must be done. >> =20 >> > >Exactly. And that's where the bitmaps come into play; you can look at >what is modified on each side, merge those sets, and copy all affected >blocks from one side to the other; afterwards, you'll have a consisten= t >block device again. > > >Sincerely, > Lars Marowsky-Br=E9e > > =20 > And if your whole farm is an Oracle database? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html