From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: berk walker Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] md bitmap bug fixes Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 15:56:10 -0500 Message-ID: <42447AEA.9050008@panix.com> References: <7e6rg2-pj1.ln1@news.it.uc3m.es> <423B09EF.8070708@steeleye.com> <23krg2-4rr.ln1@news.it.uc3m.es> <423B2F7C.3030907@steeleye.com> <423EF12A.4030207@steeleye.com> <20050321185606.GA27541@percy.comedia.it> <423F2780.5000601@steeleye.com> <20050322093525.GL7040@percy.comedia.it> <8275h2-sn4.ln1@news.it.uc3m.es> <20050323203125.GD26683@percy.comedia.it> <42447A85.2070409@panix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <42447A85.2070409@panix.com> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: berk walker Cc: "Peter T. Breuer" , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids berk walker wrote: > as I understand it, the topic is what happens when a RAID0 which is > split twixt remote sites loses communication. What would you suggest > as a method to keep the obvious from happening? > oops! RAID1.. sorry > A proactive approach, perhaps? Since, it seems, that write requests > do not have to be ack'd immediatly, there *will* be a total sync > loss. Are the write logs deep enough to be able to be used to resync, > once the systems realize that they are no longer connected? From what > I've read, the bitmaps will be no help in reconstruction, but just in > error detection (correct me if needed). > This is indeed an interesting topic, and one that strikes close to home. > b- > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > . >