From: Robey Holderith <robey@flaminglunchbox.net>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Subject: Re: out of sync raid 5 + xfs = kernel startup problem
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 22:07:59 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <425DD07F.8090802@flaminglunchbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16988.39872.477594.821987@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Neil Brown wrote:
>On Tuesday April 12, robey@flaminglunchbox.net wrote:
>
>
>>My raid5 system recently went through a sequence of power outages. When
>>everything came back on the drives were out of sync. No big issue...
>>just sync them back up again. But something is going wrong. Any help
>>is appreciated. dmesg provides the following (the network stuff is
>>mixed in):
>>
>>
>>
>
>Here's the main problem.
>
>You've got a degraded, unclean array. i.e. one drive is
>failed/missing and md isn't confident that all the parity blocks are
>correct due to an unclean shutdown (could have been in the middle of a
>write).
>This means you could have undetectable data corruption.
>
>md wants you to know this an not assume that everything is perfectly
>OK.
>
>You can still start the array, but you will need to use
> mdadm --assemble --force
>which means you need to boot first ... got a boot CD?
>
>I should add a "raid=force-start" or similar boot option, but I
>haven't yet.
>
>So, boot somehow, and
> mdadm --assemble /dev/md0 --force /dev/sd[a-f]2
>
> mdadm /dev/md0 -a /dev/sdd2
>
> wait for sync to complete (not absolutely needed).
>
>Reboot.
>
>
Thanks for the help. I rebooted using a rescue partition and used the
two commands. After about 2 hours of synching the array decided that
sdf had failed and ceased its synch. I restarted and then tried to
assemble the array once again. sdd2 and sdf2 are now both marked as
spares and the array had only 4/6 partitions... dead. Can I force the
device numbers within the array? I know that sdd2 was position 5 and
sdf2 was position 3. I'd like to save what I can... most of the data on
the array can be reproduced... but it takes so much time.
If anyone is interested during my attempts to force the array to run I
got a segfault in mdadm. I'll post a snippet here... ignore if it's old
news.
md: pers->run() failed ...
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000030 RIP:
<ffffffff802c9350>{md_error+64}
Again... thanks for any and all help.
-Robey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-14 2:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-13 1:59 out of sync raid 5 + xfs = kernel startup problem Robey Holderith
2005-04-13 4:10 ` Neil Brown
2005-04-14 2:07 ` Robey Holderith [this message]
2005-04-14 2:29 ` Neil Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=425DD07F.8090802@flaminglunchbox.net \
--to=robey@flaminglunchbox.net \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).