linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Greaves <david@dgreaves.com>
To: rv@eychenne.org
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: waiting for recovery to complete
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 12:16:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4264E88E.7020202@dgreaves.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050419102810.GH3103@eychenne.org>

Hervé Eychenne wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 10:49:14AM -0700, Tim Moore wrote:
>>The recovery daemon adjusts reconstruction speed dynamically according to 
>>available system resources.
>>Disk I/O is somewhat slower but works just fine.  You don't have to wait.
> 
> 
> So I don't have to wait to take the disk out, as the recovery will
> continue with embedded disk battery and wireless bus connection?
> How cool... ;-)
Your original phrasing looked (to me too) like you thought you couldn't 
use the raid whilst it was reconstructing (I'm still not convinced you 
realise this so, to be clear: "whilst mdadm is rebuilding the array you 
can use the array as normal with no risk of data corruption. You do 
_not_ have to wait for resync to finish before remounting and using the 
device.")
Tim's response told you you had no need to be alerted when it was OK 
since you had no need to stop working in the first place.

(And why are you wanting to take a disk out after you just synced it? - 
no, don't answer that...)

Now it looks like you just want to know when it's done for your own 
peace of mind, so...
> 
> Well... more seriously, I can't believe this question doesn't raise
> any interest, even if it seems like it does not. :-(
well, once recovery has started I don't *really* care when it finishes.
> Does everyone really type cat /proc/mdstat from time to time??
> How clumsy...
And yes, I do :)
(well, actually I optimise to <up arrow> <return>)

> I just want to chat about the best way to add a backend for this kind
> of feature, so we could implement that properly... (and yes, that is
> definitely _nedded_ if you want to do things right)
If you want to monitor _properly_ then use nagios (or monit)

Or since mdadm already uses -F to follow and notify on errors, then I 
suggest you start hacking other alert options in there...

David

-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2005-04-19 11:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-04-13  8:50 waiting for recovery to complete Hervé Eychenne
2005-04-17 17:49 ` Tim Moore
2005-04-19 10:28   ` Hervé Eychenne
2005-04-19 11:16     ` David Greaves [this message]
     [not found]       ` <62b0912f05041905226bed8997@mail.gmail.com>
2005-04-19 12:22         ` Molle Bestefich
2005-04-19 12:27           ` Alvin Oga

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4264E88E.7020202@dgreaves.com \
    --to=david@dgreaves.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rv@eychenne.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).