linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Herta Van den Eynde <herta.vandeneynde@cc.kuleuven.be>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mdadm create size problem
Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 12:12:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4278A023.3040004@cc.kuleuven.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42789B24.6040206@cc.kuleuven.be>

FWIIW, I reverted to mdadm-1.4.0-1, and that version creates the RAID1+0 
just fine.

Herta

Herta Van den Eynde wrote:
> OK, there's definitely something wrong here.  I ran a
> # mdadm --zero-superblock --force /dev/sdX
> followed by
> # dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdX bs=64k
> where X=[g-in-p], and when I try to create a RAID 1 using two of these
> devices, it still sets the size to 139904K.  When I create a RAID 0
> using the same devices, mdadm does set the size correctly.
> 
> # mdadm --create --verbose /dev/md6 --level=1 --raid-devices=2 /dev/sdh
> /dev/sdo
> mdadm: size set to 139904K
> mdadm: array /dev/md6 started.
> 
> # mdadm --create --verbose /dev/md6 --level=0 --raid-devices=2 /dev/sdh
> /dev/sdo
> mdadm: chunk size defaults to 64K
> mdadm: array /dev/md6 started.
> # mke2fs -j -v  /dev/md6
> (...)
> # mount /dev/md6 /mnt; df /mnt
> Filesystem           1k-blocks      Used Available Use% Mounted on
> /dev/md6             141124600     32828 133923052   1% /mnt
> 
> Is this a bug, or am I overlooking something?
> 
> Herta
> 
> 
> Herta Van den Eynde wrote:
> 
>> Red Hat AS 2.1 mdadm 1.11
>> I have two devices that used to be part of a now corrupt RAID10 
>> configuration.  When I try to reuse them to create a RAID1, it only 
>> uses about 1 third of the diskspace available.
>> # fdisk -l /dev/sdg
>>
>> Disk /dev/sdg: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 8924 cylinders
>> Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 bytes
>>
>>    Device Boot    Start       End    Blocks   Id  System
>> /dev/sdg1             1      8924  71681998+  fd  Linux raid autodetect
>>
>> # fdisk -l /dev/sdn
>>
>> Disk /dev/sdn: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 8924 cylinders
>> Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 bytes
>>
>>    Device Boot    Start       End    Blocks   Id  System
>> /dev/sdn1             1      8924  71681998+  fd  Linux raid autodetect
>>
>> # mdadm --create --verbose /dev/md5 --level=1 --raid-devices=2 
>> /dev/sdg /dev/sdn
>> mdadm: /dev/sdg appears to contain an ext2fs file system
>>     size=419520K  mtime=Mon May  2 17:04:04 2005
>> mdadm: /dev/sdn appears to contain an ext2fs file system
>>     size=419520K  mtime=Mon May  2 17:04:04 2005
>> mdadm: size set to 139904K
>> Continue creating array? n
>>
>> If I try to add the --size option, even a size that is 139904K or 
>> less, it tells me the size is invalid:
>>
>> # mdadm --create --verbose /dev/md5 --level=1 --raid-devices=2 
>> /dev/sdg /dev/sdn --size=139904K
>> mdadm: invalid size: 139904K
>>
>> I did reboot the system after fdisk'ing the devices.
>>
>> Do I need to low-level format these devices to be able to reuse them?
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Herta
>>
> 

-- 
Herta Van den Eynde              -=- Toledo system management
K.U. Leuven - Ludit              -=- phone: +32 (0)16 322 166
                                  -=- 50°51'27" N 004°40'39" E

"I wish I were two little cats.  Then I could play together."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2005-05-04 10:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-03 13:53 mdadm create size problem Herta Van den Eynde
2005-05-04  9:51 ` Herta Van den Eynde
2005-05-04 10:12   ` Herta Van den Eynde [this message]
2005-05-04 10:24     ` Tyler
2005-05-04 10:42       ` Herta Van den Eynde
2005-05-23 23:43 ` Neil Brown
2005-05-24  7:26   ` Luca Berra
2005-05-24 10:51     ` Neil Brown
2005-05-24 11:34       ` Luca Berra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4278A023.3040004@cc.kuleuven.be \
    --to=herta.vandeneynde@cc.kuleuven.be \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).