linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jay Strauss <me@heyjay.com>
To: Tobias Hofmann <tobias.hofmann@medien.uni-weimar.de>
Cc: Mike Hardy <mhardy@h3c.com>, Gordon Henderson <gordon@drogon.net>,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Raid 1 install revealed poor HD performance (I think)
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 18:00:26 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <428A778A.9020209@heyjay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <428A6D27.7070703@medien.uni-weimar.de>

Tobias Hofmann wrote:
> On 17.05.2005 22:54, Mike Hardy wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
>> That's fine-grained tuning mostly though, and not really on topic for
>> you as it appears you have something entirely different going on. What
>> exactly is going on, I must admit, I don't know. :-/
> 
> 
> <delurk>
> Well, let's find out then, no? ;)
> 
> Jay, you said it yourself - Knoppix seems to be setting something 
> different than Sarge. I am not very familiar with both, but doing a 
> lspci on both (just in case they "see" something different) and 
> comparing, like Gordon suggested, the output of dmesg | less (or a less 
> /var/log/dmesg) on both systems might give you an idea where things 
> start to go differently.
> 
> I would look for differences in the discovery of (the) 
> ide-controller(s), and how the HDs are discovered/treated.
> 
> For completeness' sake, the kernel version of each try could give the 
> experts an idea of differences I am not aware of.
> 
> I am sure to have forgotten something here, but for starters, it might 
> work.
> 
> Just my 2c, good luck, tobi... ;)

Ok :), when I get home I'll be doing everything everyone has asked

It's a drag booting knoppix on this machine, it takes forever

Jay


  reply	other threads:[~2005-05-17 23:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-17 15:11 Raid 1 install revealed poor HD performance (I think) Jay Strauss
2005-05-17 15:50 ` Gordon Henderson
2005-05-17 16:17   ` Jay Strauss
2005-05-17 16:23     ` Gordon Henderson
2005-05-17 16:52       ` Mike Hardy
2005-05-17 20:51         ` Jay Strauss
2005-05-17 20:54           ` Mike Hardy
2005-05-17 22:16             ` Tobias Hofmann
2005-05-17 23:00               ` Jay Strauss [this message]
2005-05-18  3:28               ` Jay Strauss
2005-05-17 22:45           ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-05-17 23:42 ` Henrik Holst
2005-05-18  3:30   ` Jay Strauss
2005-05-17 23:44 ` Henrik Holst
2005-05-19 15:32   ` Jay Strauss
2005-05-19 16:14     ` Mike Hardy
2005-05-19 18:40       ` Jay Strauss
2005-05-19 20:43         ` Mike Hardy
2005-05-20  1:43           ` Jay Strauss
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.44.0505180206580.1777-100000@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca>
2005-05-18 15:08 ` Mike Hardy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=428A778A.9020209@heyjay.com \
    --to=me@heyjay.com \
    --cc=gordon@drogon.net \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhardy@h3c.com \
    --cc=tobias.hofmann@medien.uni-weimar.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).