linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Henrik Holst <henrik_holst@home.se>
To: Jay Strauss <me@heyjay.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Raid 1 install revealed poor HD performance (I think)
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 01:42:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <428A814D.3000803@home.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <428A09A3.9000802@heyjay.com>

You might also want to try and force UltraDMA mode5 (or the highest 
UltraDMA mode supported by your hardware) with "hdparm -X69 /dev/hda" 
combined with the "Multiple sector mode" (set with "hdparm -m 16 
/dev/hda") that was suggested earlier.

/ Henrik Holst

Jay Strauss wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I just installed a simple raid-1.  I have a single HD on each 
> controller.  ie. 2 controllers 2 HDs. That's it, no CD players or DVD 
> drives...
> 
> I did a fresh install of Sarge.  After reboot I unplugged the CD drive, 
> and let the array sync overnight.  It took 10hrs to sync 160GiB, which 
> seemed pretty long, so I executed the "dd if=/dev/hda of=/dev/null 
> bs=64k count=10000" command I've seen posted on this list.
> 
> It took about a minute and change to complete, which is long.  So out of 
> curiosity I plugged in a CD player and booted Knoppix.  When I ran the 
> same command it took only 30 seconds (which is still not as quick as 
> some of the numbers on this list, but it's an old celeron 466MHz).
> 
> I'm very unfamiliar with options for speeding up hard drive access. What 
> might Knoppix be setting (and how would I look for it), that it's 
> getting 100% better drive performance than a plain jane Sarge install?
> 
> Thanks
> Jay
> 
> ******** Knoppix Run ***********
> 
> root@ttyp0[~]# for i in 1 2 3; do
>  > time dd if=/dev/hda of=/dev/null bs=64k count=10000
>  > done
> 10000+0 records in
> 10000+0 records out
> 655360000 bytes transferred in 46.301872 seconds (14154071 bytes/sec)
> 
> real    0m46.754s
> user    0m0.480s
> sys     0m29.710s
> 
> 10000+0 records in
> 10000+0 records out
> 655360000 bytes transferred in 49.852186 seconds (13146063 bytes/sec)
> 
> real    0m51.075s
> user    0m0.430s
> sys     0m26.610s
> 
> 10000+0 records in
> 10000+0 records out
> 655360000 bytes transferred in 46.237684 seconds (14173720 bytes/sec)
> 
> real    0m47.928s
> user    0m0.480s
> sys     0m31.770s
> 
> ************** Sarge Run *************
> 
> sandy:~# for i in 1 2 3; do
>  > time dd if=/dev/hda of=/dev/null bs=64k count=10000
>  > done
> 10000+0 records in
> 10000+0 records out
> 655360000 bytes transferred in 66.004525 seconds (9929016 bytes/sec)
> 
> real    1m6.052s
> user    0m0.637s
> sys     1m2.888s
> 
> 10000+0 records in
> 10000+0 records out
> 655360000 bytes transferred in 63.797226 seconds (10272547 bytes/sec)
> 
> real    1m3.886s
> user    0m0.678s
> sys     1m0.732s
> 
> 10000+0 records in
> 10000+0 records out
> 655360000 bytes transferred in 64.729628 seconds (10124575 bytes/sec)
> 
> real    1m4.822s
> user    0m0.616s
> sys     1m1.668s
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-05-17 23:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-17 15:11 Raid 1 install revealed poor HD performance (I think) Jay Strauss
2005-05-17 15:50 ` Gordon Henderson
2005-05-17 16:17   ` Jay Strauss
2005-05-17 16:23     ` Gordon Henderson
2005-05-17 16:52       ` Mike Hardy
2005-05-17 20:51         ` Jay Strauss
2005-05-17 20:54           ` Mike Hardy
2005-05-17 22:16             ` Tobias Hofmann
2005-05-17 23:00               ` Jay Strauss
2005-05-18  3:28               ` Jay Strauss
2005-05-17 22:45           ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-05-17 23:42 ` Henrik Holst [this message]
2005-05-18  3:30   ` Jay Strauss
2005-05-17 23:44 ` Henrik Holst
2005-05-19 15:32   ` Jay Strauss
2005-05-19 16:14     ` Mike Hardy
2005-05-19 18:40       ` Jay Strauss
2005-05-19 20:43         ` Mike Hardy
2005-05-20  1:43           ` Jay Strauss
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.44.0505180206580.1777-100000@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca>
2005-05-18 15:08 ` Mike Hardy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=428A814D.3000803@home.se \
    --to=henrik_holst@home.se \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=me@heyjay.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).