From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Hardy Subject: Re: Is there any way to delay reconstruction Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 09:58:13 -0700 Message-ID: <4294AEA5.6090801@h3c.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Derek Piper , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids He mentioned he was on linux 2.4 - an unclean reboot will almost always cause reconstruction there, as opposed to the aggressively clean 2.6 which almost never reconstructs. I'd imagine with 800+ boxen, there's a few reboots a day no matter what you're doing -Mike Derek Piper wrote: > Why would rebooting the machines cause raid reconstruction? that > sounds pretty bad to need to do that. Shouldn't that be addressed > first? Then you might not need to worry about reconstruction so much. > > Derek > > On 5/25/05, danci@agenda.si wrote: > > >>The problem is that usually fails with 'hdX: lost interrupt' if the disks >>are busy due to RAID reconstruction - which happens a lot as some of the >>800+ machines get rebooted for various reasons... >> > > >