From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paul Clements <paul.clements@steeleye.com>
Subject: Re: active/active vs active/passive?
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 14:23:35 -0400
Message-ID: <42A737A7.4080806@steeleye.com>
References: <1118189397.15459.108.camel@seki.nac.uci.edu>	 <42A641CC.9040905@steeleye.com>	 <1118250910.15459.132.camel@seki.nac.uci.edu>	 <42A73007.6060102@steeleye.com> <1118253658.15459.158.camel@seki.nac.uci.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1118253658.15459.158.camel@seki.nac.uci.edu>
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Dan Stromberg <strombrg@dcs.nac.uci.edu>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

Dan Stromberg wrote:

> Is the difficulty mostly stemming from keeping stateful sessions and
> content consistent across replica servers?

Yes, that's it, more or less.

--
Paul