Re: from raidtools2 to mdadm

[Clemens Schwaighofer <cs@tequila.co.jp>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1033 bytes --]

On 06/21/2005 03:25 PM, Neil Brown wrote:

> No..
> The 'devices=' bits by themselves aren't enough, and are rarely
> wanted.
> If a device isn't listed in the DEVICES lines, then it won't be
> considered for use in an array.

okay

> The 'devices=' words are quite different.  They say "this is how you
> recognise a device that is in this array.  All the devices in it are
> on this list".
> This is reported by "mdadm --detail --scan" largely for interest.  It
> should rarely be included in mdadm.conf.  The very latest version ofn
> mdadm does not report them unless --verbose is given.

okay, then I have an old one, because mine gives it to me, thats why I
had it in my conf file.

thanks for all the help

-- 
[ Clemens Schwaighofer                      -----=====:::::~ ]
[ TEQUILA\ Japan IT Group                                    ]
[                6-17-2 Ginza Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-8167, JAPAN ]
[ Tel: +81-(0)3-3545-7703            Fax: +81-(0)3-3545-7343 ]
[ http://www.tequila.co.jp                                   ]

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 256 bytes --]