linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Kowis <dkowis@shlrm.org>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, Eric Sandall <eric@sandall.us>
Subject: Re: mdadm memory leak?
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 17:04:15 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42CEF85F.5060409@shlrm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17098.64085.334793.282803@cse.unsw.edu.au>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Neil Brown wrote:
>>  OBJS ACTIVE  USE OBJ SIZE  SLABS OBJ/SLAB CACHE SIZE NAME
>>152098 151909  99%    0.02K    673      226      2692K fasync_cache
>>24867  24846  99%    0.05K    307       81      1228K buffer_head
>>12432   8306  66%    0.27K    888       14      3552K radix_tree_node
>>  7308   6876  94%    0.13K    252       29      1008K dentry_cache
>>  6303   5885  93%    0.36K    573       11      2292K reiser_inode_cache
> 
> 
> So you have about 16 megabytes used by the slab cache, none of the big
> users 'md' related. 
> 16M doesn't sound like a big deal, so I suspect this isn't the source
> of the leak. 
>  From a separate Email I see:
> 
>>Mem:    773984k total,   765556k used,     8428k free,    65812k buffers
>>Swap:  2755136k total,        0k used,  2755136k free,   526632k cached
> 
> The fact that swap isn't being touched at all suggests that you aren't
> currently running low on memory.
> The fact the free is low doesn't directly indicate a problem.  Linux
> uses free memory to cache files.  It will discard then from the cache
> if it needs more memory.
> The fact that the OOM killer is hiting obviously is a problem.  Maybe
> you need to report this on linux-kernel was an OOM problem.
> 
I've let my computer run for a while longer, and it's eaten more memory than before. I'll paste the relevant parts. I'm not sure this is a
kernel thing, since I didn't have this problem before setting up a mirrored RAID array using mdadm.

from slabtop:
 Active / Total Objects (% used)    : 80755 / 86856 (93.0%)
 Active / Total Slabs (% used)      : 2974 / 2975 (100.0%)
 Active / Total Caches (% used)     : 76 / 140 (54.3%)
 Active / Total Size (% used)       : 11445.72K / 12330.93K (92.8%)
 Minimum / Average / Maximum Object : 0.01K / 0.14K / 128.00K

  OBJS ACTIVE  USE OBJ SIZE  SLABS OBJ/SLAB CACHE SIZE NAME
 44469  44441  99%    0.05K    549       81      2196K buffer_head
  8946   8192  91%    0.27K    639       14      2556K radix_tree_node
  6960   4720  67%    0.13K    240       29       960K dentry_cache
  3510   3510 100%    0.09K     78       45       312K vm_area_struct
  3179   2522  79%    0.36K    289       11      1156K reiser_inode_cache
  3050   2477  81%    0.06K     50       61       200K size-64
  2782   2713  97%    0.04K     26      107       104K sysfs_dir_cache
  2405   2378  98%    0.29K    185       13       740K inode_cache
  2142   2142 100%    0.03K     18      119        72K size-32
  1860   1817  97%    0.12K     60       31       240K size-128
   875    875 100%    0.16K     35       25       140K filp

from free:
             total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
Mem:        773900     765416       8484          0      75680     450004
- -/+ buffers/cache:     239732     534168
Swap:      2755136     118568    2636568


Something's digesting memory and not giving it back.
I'm now running 2.6.12.1 instead of 2.6.11.12 in the hopes that something was fixed, but no.

Thanks,
- --
David Kowis

ISO Team Lead - www.sourcemage.org
SourceMage GNU/Linux

One login to rule them all, one login to find them. One login to bring them all, and in the web bind them.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFCzvhftgErhgxHMHsRAthSAJ0bSkP2xuhIeXYcuXx0P46ENdom2ACgmhB1
J0A5DfZu5vxwlKT2Dar55J8=
=pmX1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-07-08 22:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-07-05  4:24 mdadm memory leak? David Kowis
2005-07-05  4:30 ` David Kowis
2005-07-05  4:59   ` Guy
2005-07-05 15:49     ` Eric Sandall
2005-07-05 15:56     ` David Kowis
2005-07-05  4:57 ` Neil Brown
2005-07-05 15:36   ` Eric Sandall
2005-07-05 21:08     ` Neil Brown
2005-07-05 22:04       ` Eric Sandall
2005-07-06  1:30         ` Neil Brown
2005-07-09 20:11           ` Eric Sandall
2005-07-17  4:52           ` Eric Sandall
2005-07-05 15:52   ` David Kowis
2005-07-05 21:23     ` Neil Brown
2005-07-05 21:50       ` David Kowis
2005-07-08 22:04       ` David Kowis [this message]
2005-07-08 23:15         ` Tyler
2005-07-09  4:20           ` David Kowis
2005-07-05 21:41   ` David Kowis
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-07-06 16:09 Bailey, Scott

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42CEF85F.5060409@shlrm.org \
    --to=dkowis@shlrm.org \
    --cc=eric@sandall.us \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).