From: Tyler <pml@dtbb.net>
To: David Kowis <dkowis@shlrm.org>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mdadm memory leak?
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 16:15:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42CF091B.7030402@dtbb.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42CEF85F.5060409@shlrm.org>
David Kowis wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
>Neil Brown wrote:
>
>
>>> OBJS ACTIVE USE OBJ SIZE SLABS OBJ/SLAB CACHE SIZE NAME
>>>152098 151909 99% 0.02K 673 226 2692K fasync_cache
>>>24867 24846 99% 0.05K 307 81 1228K buffer_head
>>>12432 8306 66% 0.27K 888 14 3552K radix_tree_node
>>> 7308 6876 94% 0.13K 252 29 1008K dentry_cache
>>> 6303 5885 93% 0.36K 573 11 2292K reiser_inode_cache
>>>
>>>
>>So you have about 16 megabytes used by the slab cache, none of the big
>>users 'md' related.
>>16M doesn't sound like a big deal, so I suspect this isn't the source
>>of the leak.
>> From a separate Email I see:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Mem: 773984k total, 765556k used, 8428k free, 65812k buffers
>>>Swap: 2755136k total, 0k used, 2755136k free, 526632k cached
>>>
>>>
>>The fact that swap isn't being touched at all suggests that you aren't
>>currently running low on memory.
>>The fact the free is low doesn't directly indicate a problem. Linux
>>uses free memory to cache files. It will discard then from the cache
>>if it needs more memory.
>>The fact that the OOM killer is hiting obviously is a problem. Maybe
>>you need to report this on linux-kernel was an OOM problem.
>>
>>
>>
>I've let my computer run for a while longer, and it's eaten more memory than before. I'll paste the relevant parts. I'm not sure this is a
>kernel thing, since I didn't have this problem before setting up a mirrored RAID array using mdadm.
>
>
>
David, unless you have mdadm running in monitor mode, its not "actively"
in memory.. the MD driver is in the kernel, and in memory. Mdadm is
simply a tool, just as fsck.ext2 or such.. its not active until you run
it, and leaves memory when it finishes its one task. (Someone correct
me if I'm wrong please....).
Tyler.
>from slabtop:
> Active / Total Objects (% used) : 80755 / 86856 (93.0%)
> Active / Total Slabs (% used) : 2974 / 2975 (100.0%)
> Active / Total Caches (% used) : 76 / 140 (54.3%)
> Active / Total Size (% used) : 11445.72K / 12330.93K (92.8%)
> Minimum / Average / Maximum Object : 0.01K / 0.14K / 128.00K
>
> OBJS ACTIVE USE OBJ SIZE SLABS OBJ/SLAB CACHE SIZE NAME
> 44469 44441 99% 0.05K 549 81 2196K buffer_head
> 8946 8192 91% 0.27K 639 14 2556K radix_tree_node
> 6960 4720 67% 0.13K 240 29 960K dentry_cache
> 3510 3510 100% 0.09K 78 45 312K vm_area_struct
> 3179 2522 79% 0.36K 289 11 1156K reiser_inode_cache
> 3050 2477 81% 0.06K 50 61 200K size-64
> 2782 2713 97% 0.04K 26 107 104K sysfs_dir_cache
> 2405 2378 98% 0.29K 185 13 740K inode_cache
> 2142 2142 100% 0.03K 18 119 72K size-32
> 1860 1817 97% 0.12K 60 31 240K size-128
> 875 875 100% 0.16K 35 25 140K filp
>
>from free:
> total used free shared buffers cached
>Mem: 773900 765416 8484 0 75680 450004
>- -/+ buffers/cache: 239732 534168
>Swap: 2755136 118568 2636568
>
>
>Something's digesting memory and not giving it back.
>I'm now running 2.6.12.1 instead of 2.6.11.12 in the hopes that something was fixed, but no.
>
>Thanks,
>- --
>David Kowis
>
>ISO Team Lead - www.sourcemage.org
>SourceMage GNU/Linux
>
>One login to rule them all, one login to find them. One login to bring them all, and in the web bind them.
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
>
>iD8DBQFCzvhftgErhgxHMHsRAthSAJ0bSkP2xuhIeXYcuXx0P46ENdom2ACgmhB1
>J0A5DfZu5vxwlKT2Dar55J8=
>=pmX1
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-08 23:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-05 4:24 mdadm memory leak? David Kowis
2005-07-05 4:30 ` David Kowis
2005-07-05 4:59 ` Guy
2005-07-05 15:49 ` Eric Sandall
2005-07-05 15:56 ` David Kowis
2005-07-05 4:57 ` Neil Brown
2005-07-05 15:36 ` Eric Sandall
2005-07-05 21:08 ` Neil Brown
2005-07-05 22:04 ` Eric Sandall
2005-07-06 1:30 ` Neil Brown
2005-07-09 20:11 ` Eric Sandall
2005-07-17 4:52 ` Eric Sandall
2005-07-05 15:52 ` David Kowis
2005-07-05 21:23 ` Neil Brown
2005-07-05 21:50 ` David Kowis
2005-07-08 22:04 ` David Kowis
2005-07-08 23:15 ` Tyler [this message]
2005-07-09 4:20 ` David Kowis
2005-07-05 21:41 ` David Kowis
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-07-06 16:09 Bailey, Scott
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42CF091B.7030402@dtbb.net \
--to=pml@dtbb.net \
--cc=dkowis@shlrm.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).