linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tyler <pml@dtbb.net>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Subject: Re: bug report: mdadm-devel-2 , superblock version 1
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 19:19:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42DB11B8.1090501@dtbb.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42DB0F41.7030806@dtbb.net>

As a side note, do I need any kernel patches to use the version 1 
superblocks Neil?  That may be what i'm missing.. as the kernel in use 
currently is a vanilla 2.6.12.3.  I'm not trying to use bitmaps or 
anything else at the moment.

Tyler.

Tyler wrote:

> # uname -a
> Linux server 2.6.12.3 #3 SMP Sun Jul 17 14:38:12 CEST 2005 i686 GNU/Linux
> # ./mdadm -V
> mdadm - v2.0-devel-2 - DEVELOPMENT VERSION NOT FOR REGULAR USE - 7 
> July 2005
>
> root@server:~/dev/mdadm-2.0-devel-2# ./mdadm -S /dev/md1
>
> ** stop the current array
>
> root@server:~/dev/mdadm-2.0-devel-2# ./mdadm -C /dev/md1 -l 5 
> --raid-devices 3 -e 1 /dev/sda2 /dev/sdb2 /dev/sdc2
> mdadm: /dev/sda2 appears to be part of a raid array:
>    level=5 devices=3 ctime=Mon Jul 18 03:22:05 2005
> mdadm: /dev/sdb2 appears to be part of a raid array:
>    level=5 devices=3 ctime=Mon Jul 18 03:22:05 2005
> mdadm: /dev/sdc2 appears to be part of a raid array:
>    level=5 devices=3 ctime=Mon Jul 18 03:22:05 2005
> Continue creating array? y
> mdadm: array /dev/md1 started.
>
> ** create and start new array using 3 drives, superblock version 1
>
> root@server:~/dev/mdadm-2.0-devel-2# cat /proc/mdstat
> Personalities : [raid5]
> md1 : active raid5 sdc2[3] sdb2[1] sda2[0]
>      128384 blocks level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [3/3] [UUU]
>
> unused devices: <none>
>
> ** mdstat mostly okay, except sdc2 is listed as device3 instead of 
> device2 (from 0,1,2)
>
> root@server:~/dev/mdadm-2.0-devel-2# ./mdadm -D /dev/md1
> /dev/md1:
>        Version : 01.00.01
>  Creation Time : Mon Jul 18 03:56:40 2005
>     Raid Level : raid5
>     Array Size : 128384 (125.40 MiB 131.47 MB)
>    Device Size : 64192 (62.70 MiB 65.73 MB)
>   Raid Devices : 3
>  Total Devices : 3
> Preferred Minor : 1
>    Persistence : Superblock is persistent
>
>    Update Time : Mon Jul 18 03:56:42 2005
>          State : clean
> Active Devices : 3
> Working Devices : 3
> Failed Devices : 0
>  Spare Devices : 0
>
>         Layout : left-symmetric
>     Chunk Size : 64K
>
>           UUID : 1baa875e87:9ec208b2:7f5e6a27:db1f5e
>         Events : 1
>
>    Number   Major   Minor   RaidDevice State
>       0       8        2        0      active sync   
> /dev/.static/dev/sda2
>       1       8       18        1      active sync   
> /dev/.static/dev/sdb2
>       2       0        0        -      removed
>
>       3       8       34        2      active sync   
> /dev/.static/dev/sdc2
>
> ** reports version 01.00.01 superblock, but reports as if there were 4 
> devices used
>
> root@server:~/dev/mdadm-2.0-devel-2# ./mdadm -S /dev/md1
>
> ** stop the array
>
> root@server:~/dev/mdadm-2.0-devel-2# ./mdadm -A /dev/md1
> Segmentation fault
>
> ** try to assemble the array
>
> root@server:~/dev/mdadm-2.0-devel-2# ./mdadm -D /dev/md1
> mdadm: md device /dev/md1 does not appear to be active.
>
> ** check if its active at all
>
> root@server:~/dev/mdadm-2.0-devel-2# ./mdadm -A /dev/md1 /dev/sda2 
> /dev/sdb2 /dev/sdc2
> mdadm: device 1 in /dev/md1 has wrong state in superblock, but 
> /dev/sdb2 seems ok
> mdadm: device 2 in /dev/md1 has wrong state in superblock, but 
> /dev/sdc2 seems ok
> mdadm: /dev/md1 has been started with 3 drives.
>
> ** try restarting it with drive details, and it starts
>
> root@server:~/dev/mdadm-2.0-devel-2# ./mdadm -D /dev/md1
> /dev/md1:
>        Version : 00.90.01
>  Creation Time : Mon Jul 18 02:53:55 2005
>     Raid Level : raid5
>     Array Size : 128384 (125.40 MiB 131.47 MB)
>    Device Size : 64192 (62.70 MiB 65.73 MB)
>   Raid Devices : 3
>  Total Devices : 3
> Preferred Minor : 1
>    Persistence : Superblock is persistent
>
>    Update Time : Mon Jul 18 02:53:57 2005
>          State : clean
> Active Devices : 3
> Working Devices : 3
> Failed Devices : 0
>  Spare Devices : 0
>
>         Layout : left-symmetric
>     Chunk Size : 64K
>
>           UUID : e798f37d:baf98c2f:e714b50c:8d1018b1
>         Events : 0.2
>
>    Number   Major   Minor   RaidDevice State
>       0       8        2        0      active sync   
> /dev/.static/dev/sda2
>       1       8       18        1      active sync   
> /dev/.static/dev/sdb2
>       2       8       34        2      active sync   
> /dev/.static/dev/sdc2
>
> ** magically, we now have a v00.90.01 superblock, it reports the 
> proper list of drives
>
> root@server:~/dev/mdadm-2.0-devel-2# ./mdadm -S /dev/md1
> root@server:~/dev/mdadm-2.0-devel-2# ./mdadm -A /dev/md1
> Segmentation fault
>
> ** try to stop and restart again, doesn't work
>
> root@server:~/dev/mdadm-2.0-devel-2# ./mdadm -E /dev/sda2
> /dev/sda2:
>          Magic : a92b4efc
>        Version : 01.00
>     Array UUID : 1baa875e87:9ec208b2:7f5e6a27:db1f5e
>           Name :
>  Creation Time : Mon Jul 18 03:56:40 2005
>     Raid Level : raid5
>   Raid Devices : 3
>
>    Device Size : 128504 (62.76 MiB 65.79 MB)
>   Super Offset : 128504 sectors
>          State : clean
>    Device UUID : 1baa875e87:9ec208b2:7f5e6a27:db1f5e
>    Update Time : Mon Jul 18 03:56:42 2005
>       Checksum : 903062ed - correct
>         Events : 1
>
>         Layout : left-symmetric
>     Chunk Size : 64K
>
>   Array State : Uuu 1 failed
>
> ** the drives themselves still report a version 1 superblock... wierd
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>

  reply	other threads:[~2005-07-18  2:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-07-17 15:44 Raid5 Failure David M. Strang
2005-07-17 22:05 ` Neil Brown
2005-07-17 23:15   ` David M. Strang
2005-07-18  0:05     ` Tyler
2005-07-18  0:23       ` David M. Strang
2005-07-18  0:06     ` Neil Brown
2005-07-18  0:52       ` David M. Strang
2005-07-18  1:06         ` Neil Brown
2005-07-18  1:26           ` David M. Strang
2005-07-18  1:31             ` David M. Strang
     [not found]           ` <001601c58b37$620c69d0$c200a8c0@NCNF5131FTH>
2005-07-18  1:33             ` Neil Brown
2005-07-18  1:46               ` David M. Strang
2005-07-18  2:10                 ` Tyler
2005-07-18  2:12                   ` David M. Strang
2005-07-18  2:15                 ` Neil Brown
2005-07-18  2:24                   ` David M. Strang
2005-07-18  2:09               ` bug report: mdadm-devel-2 , superblock version 1 Tyler
2005-07-18  2:19                 ` Tyler [this message]
2005-07-25  0:37                   ` Neil Brown
2005-07-25  0:36                 ` Neil Brown
2005-07-25  3:47                   ` Tyler
2005-07-27  2:08                     ` Neil Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42DB11B8.1090501@dtbb.net \
    --to=pml@dtbb.net \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).