From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tyler Subject: Any chance you can look at this Superblock v1 bug Neil? Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 15:28:15 -0700 Message-ID: <42E2C47F.409@dtbb.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------080300050809090204030606" Return-path: Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Linux RAID Cc: Neil Brown List-Id: linux-raid.ids This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------080300050809090204030606 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit [Fwd: bug report: mdadm-devel-2 , superblock version 1] I believe I've now tryed this with a patched mdadm devel-2, and a 2.6.13-rc3-mm1 kernel (which as a few recent md patches), with the same results. Thanks, Tyler. --------------080300050809090204030606 Content-Type: message/rfc822; name="bug report: mdadm-devel-2 , superblock version 1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="bug report: mdadm-devel-2 , superblock version 1" X-Account-Key: account2 Return-Path: Delivered-To: 1-pml@dtbb.net Received: (qmail 17630 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2005 02:12:53 -0000 Received: from vger.kernel.org (12.107.209.244) by w2creative.info with SMTP; 18 Jul 2005 02:12:53 -0000 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261171AbVGRCJF (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Jul 2005 22:09:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261196AbVGRCJF (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Jul 2005 22:09:05 -0400 Received: from defout.telus.net ([199.185.220.240]:4761 "EHLO priv-edtnes46.telusplanet.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261171AbVGRCJD (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Jul 2005 22:09:03 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.28] (really [142.179.55.145]) by priv-edtnes46.telusplanet.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.04 201-2131-118-104-20050224) with ESMTP id <20050718020902.WCNT12195.priv-edtnes46.telusplanet.net@[192.168.0.28]>; Sun, 17 Jul 2005 20:09:02 -0600 Message-ID: <42DB0F41.7030806@dtbb.net> Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 19:09:05 -0700 From: Tyler User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.5 (Windows/20050711) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Neil Brown CC: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org Subject: bug report: mdadm-devel-2 , superblock version 1 References: <009401c58ae6$65b57870$c200a8c0@NCNF5131FTH> <17114.54800.132155.142544@cse.unsw.edu.au> <00e101c58b25$6f5c06c0$c200a8c0@NCNF5131FTH> <17114.62108.319878.983091@cse.unsw.edu.au> <010701c58b32$ee423830$c200a8c0@NCNF5131FTH> <17115.149.130115.176372@cse.unsw.edu.au> <001601c58b37$620c69d0$c200a8c0@NCNF5131FTH> <17115.1749.370942.838069@cse.unsw.edu.au> In-Reply-To: <17115.1749.370942.838069@cse.unsw.edu.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org X-Antivirus: AVG for E-mail 7.0.323 [267.9.0] # uname -a Linux server 2.6.12.3 #3 SMP Sun Jul 17 14:38:12 CEST 2005 i686 GNU/Linux # ./mdadm -V mdadm - v2.0-devel-2 - DEVELOPMENT VERSION NOT FOR REGULAR USE - 7 July 2005 root@server:~/dev/mdadm-2.0-devel-2# ./mdadm -S /dev/md1 ** stop the current array root@server:~/dev/mdadm-2.0-devel-2# ./mdadm -C /dev/md1 -l 5 --raid-devices 3 -e 1 /dev/sda2 /dev/sdb2 /dev/sdc2 mdadm: /dev/sda2 appears to be part of a raid array: level=5 devices=3 ctime=Mon Jul 18 03:22:05 2005 mdadm: /dev/sdb2 appears to be part of a raid array: level=5 devices=3 ctime=Mon Jul 18 03:22:05 2005 mdadm: /dev/sdc2 appears to be part of a raid array: level=5 devices=3 ctime=Mon Jul 18 03:22:05 2005 Continue creating array? y mdadm: array /dev/md1 started. ** create and start new array using 3 drives, superblock version 1 root@server:~/dev/mdadm-2.0-devel-2# cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid5] md1 : active raid5 sdc2[3] sdb2[1] sda2[0] 128384 blocks level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [3/3] [UUU] unused devices: ** mdstat mostly okay, except sdc2 is listed as device3 instead of device2 (from 0,1,2) root@server:~/dev/mdadm-2.0-devel-2# ./mdadm -D /dev/md1 /dev/md1: Version : 01.00.01 Creation Time : Mon Jul 18 03:56:40 2005 Raid Level : raid5 Array Size : 128384 (125.40 MiB 131.47 MB) Device Size : 64192 (62.70 MiB 65.73 MB) Raid Devices : 3 Total Devices : 3 Preferred Minor : 1 Persistence : Superblock is persistent Update Time : Mon Jul 18 03:56:42 2005 State : clean Active Devices : 3 Working Devices : 3 Failed Devices : 0 Spare Devices : 0 Layout : left-symmetric Chunk Size : 64K UUID : 1baa875e87:9ec208b2:7f5e6a27:db1f5e Events : 1 Number Major Minor RaidDevice State 0 8 2 0 active sync /dev/.static/dev/sda2 1 8 18 1 active sync /dev/.static/dev/sdb2 2 0 0 - removed 3 8 34 2 active sync /dev/.static/dev/sdc2 ** reports version 01.00.01 superblock, but reports as if there were 4 devices used root@server:~/dev/mdadm-2.0-devel-2# ./mdadm -S /dev/md1 ** stop the array root@server:~/dev/mdadm-2.0-devel-2# ./mdadm -A /dev/md1 Segmentation fault ** try to assemble the array root@server:~/dev/mdadm-2.0-devel-2# ./mdadm -D /dev/md1 mdadm: md device /dev/md1 does not appear to be active. ** check if its active at all root@server:~/dev/mdadm-2.0-devel-2# ./mdadm -A /dev/md1 /dev/sda2 /dev/sdb2 /dev/sdc2 mdadm: device 1 in /dev/md1 has wrong state in superblock, but /dev/sdb2 seems ok mdadm: device 2 in /dev/md1 has wrong state in superblock, but /dev/sdc2 seems ok mdadm: /dev/md1 has been started with 3 drives. ** try restarting it with drive details, and it starts root@server:~/dev/mdadm-2.0-devel-2# ./mdadm -D /dev/md1 /dev/md1: Version : 00.90.01 Creation Time : Mon Jul 18 02:53:55 2005 Raid Level : raid5 Array Size : 128384 (125.40 MiB 131.47 MB) Device Size : 64192 (62.70 MiB 65.73 MB) Raid Devices : 3 Total Devices : 3 Preferred Minor : 1 Persistence : Superblock is persistent Update Time : Mon Jul 18 02:53:57 2005 State : clean Active Devices : 3 Working Devices : 3 Failed Devices : 0 Spare Devices : 0 Layout : left-symmetric Chunk Size : 64K UUID : e798f37d:baf98c2f:e714b50c:8d1018b1 Events : 0.2 Number Major Minor RaidDevice State 0 8 2 0 active sync /dev/.static/dev/sda2 1 8 18 1 active sync /dev/.static/dev/sdb2 2 8 34 2 active sync /dev/.static/dev/sdc2 ** magically, we now have a v00.90.01 superblock, it reports the proper list of drives root@server:~/dev/mdadm-2.0-devel-2# ./mdadm -S /dev/md1 root@server:~/dev/mdadm-2.0-devel-2# ./mdadm -A /dev/md1 Segmentation fault ** try to stop and restart again, doesn't work root@server:~/dev/mdadm-2.0-devel-2# ./mdadm -E /dev/sda2 /dev/sda2: Magic : a92b4efc Version : 01.00 Array UUID : 1baa875e87:9ec208b2:7f5e6a27:db1f5e Name : Creation Time : Mon Jul 18 03:56:40 2005 Raid Level : raid5 Raid Devices : 3 Device Size : 128504 (62.76 MiB 65.79 MB) Super Offset : 128504 sectors State : clean Device UUID : 1baa875e87:9ec208b2:7f5e6a27:db1f5e Update Time : Mon Jul 18 03:56:42 2005 Checksum : 903062ed - correct Events : 1 Layout : left-symmetric Chunk Size : 64K Array State : Uuu 1 failed ** the drives themselves still report a version 1 superblock... wierd - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html --------------080300050809090204030606 Content-Type: message/rfc822; name="Re: bug report: mdadm-devel-2 , superblock version 1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="Re: bug report: mdadm-devel-2 , superblock version 1" X-Account-Key: account2 Return-Path: Delivered-To: 1-pml@dtbb.net Received: (qmail 17786 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2005 02:23:16 -0000 Received: from vger.kernel.org (12.107.209.244) by needtoreadit.com with SMTP; 18 Jul 2005 02:23:16 -0000 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261486AbVGRCTi (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Jul 2005 22:19:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261487AbVGRCTi (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Jul 2005 22:19:38 -0400 Received: from outbound04.telus.net ([199.185.220.223]:64422 "EHLO priv-edtnes51.telusplanet.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261486AbVGRCTe (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Jul 2005 22:19:34 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.28] (really [142.179.55.145]) by priv-edtnes51.telusplanet.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.04 201-2131-118-104-20050224) with ESMTP id <20050718021933.ZASQ24306.priv-edtnes51.telusplanet.net@[192.168.0.28]>; Sun, 17 Jul 2005 20:19:33 -0600 Message-ID: <42DB11B8.1090501@dtbb.net> Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 19:19:36 -0700 From: Tyler User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.5 (Windows/20050711) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org CC: Neil Brown Subject: Re: bug report: mdadm-devel-2 , superblock version 1 References: <009401c58ae6$65b57870$c200a8c0@NCNF5131FTH> <17114.54800.132155.142544@cse.unsw.edu.au> <00e101c58b25$6f5c06c0$c200a8c0@NCNF5131FTH> <17114.62108.319878.983091@cse.unsw.edu.au> <010701c58b32$ee423830$c200a8c0@NCNF5131FTH> <17115.149.130115.176372@cse.unsw.edu.au> <001601c58b37$620c69d0$c200a8c0@NCNF5131FTH> <17115.1749.370942.838069@cse.unsw.edu.au> <42DB0F41.7030806@dtbb.net> In-Reply-To: <42DB0F41.7030806@dtbb.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org X-Antivirus: AVG for E-mail 7.0.323 [267.9.0] As a side note, do I need any kernel patches to use the version 1 superblocks Neil? That may be what i'm missing.. as the kernel in use currently is a vanilla 2.6.12.3. I'm not trying to use bitmaps or anything else at the moment. Tyler. Tyler wrote: > # uname -a > Linux server 2.6.12.3 #3 SMP Sun Jul 17 14:38:12 CEST 2005 i686 GNU/Linux > # ./mdadm -V > mdadm - v2.0-devel-2 - DEVELOPMENT VERSION NOT FOR REGULAR USE - 7 > July 2005 > > root@server:~/dev/mdadm-2.0-devel-2# ./mdadm -S /dev/md1 > > ** stop the current array > > root@server:~/dev/mdadm-2.0-devel-2# ./mdadm -C /dev/md1 -l 5 > --raid-devices 3 -e 1 /dev/sda2 /dev/sdb2 /dev/sdc2 > mdadm: /dev/sda2 appears to be part of a raid array: > level=5 devices=3 ctime=Mon Jul 18 03:22:05 2005 > mdadm: /dev/sdb2 appears to be part of a raid array: > level=5 devices=3 ctime=Mon Jul 18 03:22:05 2005 > mdadm: /dev/sdc2 appears to be part of a raid array: > level=5 devices=3 ctime=Mon Jul 18 03:22:05 2005 > Continue creating array? y > mdadm: array /dev/md1 started. > > ** create and start new array using 3 drives, superblock version 1 > > root@server:~/dev/mdadm-2.0-devel-2# cat /proc/mdstat > Personalities : [raid5] > md1 : active raid5 sdc2[3] sdb2[1] sda2[0] > 128384 blocks level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [3/3] [UUU] > > unused devices: > > ** mdstat mostly okay, except sdc2 is listed as device3 instead of > device2 (from 0,1,2) > > root@server:~/dev/mdadm-2.0-devel-2# ./mdadm -D /dev/md1 > /dev/md1: > Version : 01.00.01 > Creation Time : Mon Jul 18 03:56:40 2005 > Raid Level : raid5 > Array Size : 128384 (125.40 MiB 131.47 MB) > Device Size : 64192 (62.70 MiB 65.73 MB) > Raid Devices : 3 > Total Devices : 3 > Preferred Minor : 1 > Persistence : Superblock is persistent > > Update Time : Mon Jul 18 03:56:42 2005 > State : clean > Active Devices : 3 > Working Devices : 3 > Failed Devices : 0 > Spare Devices : 0 > > Layout : left-symmetric > Chunk Size : 64K > > UUID : 1baa875e87:9ec208b2:7f5e6a27:db1f5e > Events : 1 > > Number Major Minor RaidDevice State > 0 8 2 0 active sync > /dev/.static/dev/sda2 > 1 8 18 1 active sync > /dev/.static/dev/sdb2 > 2 0 0 - removed > > 3 8 34 2 active sync > /dev/.static/dev/sdc2 > > ** reports version 01.00.01 superblock, but reports as if there were 4 > devices used > > root@server:~/dev/mdadm-2.0-devel-2# ./mdadm -S /dev/md1 > > ** stop the array > > root@server:~/dev/mdadm-2.0-devel-2# ./mdadm -A /dev/md1 > Segmentation fault > > ** try to assemble the array > > root@server:~/dev/mdadm-2.0-devel-2# ./mdadm -D /dev/md1 > mdadm: md device /dev/md1 does not appear to be active. > > ** check if its active at all > > root@server:~/dev/mdadm-2.0-devel-2# ./mdadm -A /dev/md1 /dev/sda2 > /dev/sdb2 /dev/sdc2 > mdadm: device 1 in /dev/md1 has wrong state in superblock, but > /dev/sdb2 seems ok > mdadm: device 2 in /dev/md1 has wrong state in superblock, but > /dev/sdc2 seems ok > mdadm: /dev/md1 has been started with 3 drives. > > ** try restarting it with drive details, and it starts > > root@server:~/dev/mdadm-2.0-devel-2# ./mdadm -D /dev/md1 > /dev/md1: > Version : 00.90.01 > Creation Time : Mon Jul 18 02:53:55 2005 > Raid Level : raid5 > Array Size : 128384 (125.40 MiB 131.47 MB) > Device Size : 64192 (62.70 MiB 65.73 MB) > Raid Devices : 3 > Total Devices : 3 > Preferred Minor : 1 > Persistence : Superblock is persistent > > Update Time : Mon Jul 18 02:53:57 2005 > State : clean > Active Devices : 3 > Working Devices : 3 > Failed Devices : 0 > Spare Devices : 0 > > Layout : left-symmetric > Chunk Size : 64K > > UUID : e798f37d:baf98c2f:e714b50c:8d1018b1 > Events : 0.2 > > Number Major Minor RaidDevice State > 0 8 2 0 active sync > /dev/.static/dev/sda2 > 1 8 18 1 active sync > /dev/.static/dev/sdb2 > 2 8 34 2 active sync > /dev/.static/dev/sdc2 > > ** magically, we now have a v00.90.01 superblock, it reports the > proper list of drives > > root@server:~/dev/mdadm-2.0-devel-2# ./mdadm -S /dev/md1 > root@server:~/dev/mdadm-2.0-devel-2# ./mdadm -A /dev/md1 > Segmentation fault > > ** try to stop and restart again, doesn't work > > root@server:~/dev/mdadm-2.0-devel-2# ./mdadm -E /dev/sda2 > /dev/sda2: > Magic : a92b4efc > Version : 01.00 > Array UUID : 1baa875e87:9ec208b2:7f5e6a27:db1f5e > Name : > Creation Time : Mon Jul 18 03:56:40 2005 > Raid Level : raid5 > Raid Devices : 3 > > Device Size : 128504 (62.76 MiB 65.79 MB) > Super Offset : 128504 sectors > State : clean > Device UUID : 1baa875e87:9ec208b2:7f5e6a27:db1f5e > Update Time : Mon Jul 18 03:56:42 2005 > Checksum : 903062ed - correct > Events : 1 > > Layout : left-symmetric > Chunk Size : 64K > > Array State : Uuu 1 failed > > ** the drives themselves still report a version 1 superblock... wierd > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html --------------080300050809090204030606--