From: Tyler <pml@dtbb.net>
Cc: Frank Blendinger <fb@intoxicatedmind.net>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Failed RAID-5 with 4 disks
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:12:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42E6C342.9000304@dtbb.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42E6B213.8020108@dtbb.net>
I had a typo in my original email, near the end, where I say "was
fubar... then I would try the above steps, but force the assemble with
the original failed disk", I actually meant to say "but force the
assemble with the newly DD'd copy of the original/first drive that failed."
Tyler.
Tyler wrote:
> My suggestion would be to buy two new drives, and DD (or dd rescue)
> the two bad drives onto the new drives, and then plug the new drive
> that has the most recent failure on it (HDG?) in, and try running a
> forced assemble including the HDG drive, then, in readonly mode, run
> an fsck to check the file system, and see if it thinks most things are
> okay. *IF* it checks out okay (for the most part.. you will probably
> lose some data), then plug the second new disk in, and add it to the
> array as a spare, and it would then start a resync of the array.
> Otherwise, if the fsck found that the entire filesystem was fubar...
> then I would try the above steps, but force the assemble with the
> original failed disk.. but depending on how long in between the two
> failures its been, and if any data was written to the array after the
> first failure, this is probably not going to be a good thing.. but
> could still be useful if you were trying to recover specific files
> that were not touched in between the two failures.
>
> I would also suggest googling raid manual recovery procedures, some
> info is outdated, but some of it describes what I just described above.
>
> Tyler.
>
> Frank Blendinger wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a RAID-5 set up with the following raidtab:
>>
>> raiddev /dev/md0
>> raid-level 5
>> nr-raid-disks 4
>> nr-spare-disks 0
>> persistent-superblock 1
>> parity-algorithm left-symmetric
>> chunk-size 256
>> device /dev/hde
>> raid-disk 0
>> device /dev/hdg
>> raid-disk 1
>> device /dev/hdi
>> raid-disk 2
>> device /dev/hdk
>> raid-disk 3
>>
>> My hde has failed some time ago, leaving some hde: dma_intr:
>> status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
>> hde: dma_intr: error=0x84 { DriveStatusError BadCRC }
>> messages in the syslog.
>>
>> I wanted to get sure it really was damaged, so I did a badblocks
>> (read-only) scan on /dev/hde. It actually found a bad sector on the
>> disk.
>>
>>
>> I wanted to take the disk out to get me a new one, but unfortunately my
>> hdg seems to have run into trouble too, now. I also have some
>> SeekComplete/BadCRC errors in my log for that disk, too.
>>
>> Furthermore, i got this:
>>
>> Jul 25 10:35:49 blackbox kernel: ide: failed opcode was: unknown
>> Jul 25 10:35:49 blackbox kernel: hdg: DMA disabled
>> Jul 25 10:35:49 blackbox kernel: PDC202XX: Secondary channel reset.
>> Jul 25 10:35:49 blackbox kernel: PDC202XX: Primary channel reset.
>> Jul 25 10:35:49 blackbox kernel: hde: lost interrupt
>> Jul 25 10:35:49 blackbox kernel: ide3: reset: master: error (0x00?)
>> Jul 25 10:35:49 blackbox kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev hdg,
>> sector 488396928
>> Jul 25 10:35:49 blackbox kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev hdg,
>> sector 159368976
>> Jul 25 10:35:49 blackbox kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev hdg,
>> sector 159368984
>> Jul 25 10:35:49 blackbox kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev hdg,
>> sector 159368992
>> Jul 25 10:35:49 blackbox kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev hdg,
>> sector 159369000
>> Jul 25 10:35:49 blackbox kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev hdg,
>> sector 159369008
>> Jul 25 10:35:49 blackbox kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev hdg,
>> sector 159369016
>> Jul 25 10:35:49 blackbox kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev hdg,
>> sector 159369024
>> Jul 25 10:35:49 blackbox kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev hdg,
>> sector 159369032
>> Jul 25 10:35:49 blackbox kernel: md: write_disk_sb failed for device hdg
>> Jul 25 10:35:49 blackbox kernel: lost page write due to I/O error on md0
>> Jul 25 10:35:49 blackbox kernel: lost page write due to I/O error on md0
>> Jul 25 10:35:49 blackbox kernel: RAID5 conf printout:
>> Jul 25 10:35:49 blackbox kernel: --- rd:4 wd:2 fd:2
>> Jul 25 10:35:49 blackbox kernel: disk 0, o:1, dev:hdk
>> Jul 25 10:35:49 blackbox kernel: disk 1, o:1, dev:hdi
>> Jul 25 10:35:49 blackbox kernel: disk 2, o:0, dev:hdg
>> Jul 25 10:35:49 blackbox kernel: RAID5 conf printout:
>> Jul 25 10:35:49 blackbox kernel: --- rd:4 wd:2 fd:2
>> Jul 25 10:35:49 blackbox kernel: disk 0, o:1, dev:hdk
>> Jul 25 10:35:49 blackbox kernel: disk 1, o:1, dev:hdi
>> Jul 25 10:35:49 blackbox kernel: lost page write due to I/O error on md0
>>
>>
>> Well, now it seems I have to failed disks in my RAID-5, which of course
>> would be fatal. I am still hoping to somehow rescue the data on the
>> array somehow, but I am not sure what would be the best approach. I
>> don't
>> want to cause any more damage.
>>
>> When booting my system with all four disks connected, hde and hdg as
>> expected won't get added:
>>
>> Jul 26 18:07:59 blackbox kernel: md: hdg has invalid sb, not importing!
>> Jul 26 18:07:59 blackbox kernel: md: autorun ...
>> Jul 26 18:07:59 blackbox kernel: md: considering hdi ...
>> Jul 26 18:07:59 blackbox kernel: md: adding hdi ...
>> Jul 26 18:07:59 blackbox kernel: md: adding hdk ...
>> Jul 26 18:07:59 blackbox kernel: md: adding hde ...
>> Jul 26 18:07:59 blackbox kernel: md: created md0
>> Jul 26 18:07:59 blackbox kernel: md: bind<hde>
>> Jul 26 18:07:59 blackbox kernel: md: bind<hdk>
>> Jul 26 18:07:59 blackbox kernel: md: bind<hdi>
>> Jul 26 18:07:59 blackbox kernel: md: running: <hdi><hdk><hde>
>> Jul 26 18:07:59 blackbox kernel: md: kicking non-fresh hde from array!
>> Jul 26 18:07:59 blackbox kernel: md: unbind<hde>
>> Jul 26 18:07:59 blackbox kernel: md: export_rdev(hde)
>> Jul 26 18:07:59 blackbox kernel: raid5: device hdi operational as
>> raid disk 1
>> Jul 26 18:07:59 blackbox kernel: raid5: device hdk operational as
>> raid disk 0
>> Jul 26 18:07:59 blackbox kernel: RAID5 conf printout:
>> Jul 26 18:07:59 blackbox kernel: --- rd:4 wd:2 fd:2
>> Jul 26 18:07:59 blackbox kernel: disk 0, o:1, dev:hdk
>> Jul 26 18:07:59 blackbox kernel: disk 1, o:1, dev:hdi
>> Jul 26 18:07:59 blackbox kernel: md: do_md_run() returned -22
>> Jul 26 18:07:59 blackbox kernel: md: md0 stopped.
>> Jul 26 18:07:59 blackbox kernel: md: unbind<hdi>
>> Jul 26 18:07:59 blackbox kernel: md: export_rdev(hdi)
>> Jul 26 18:07:59 blackbox kernel: md: unbind<hdk>
>> Jul 26 18:07:59 blackbox kernel: md: export_rdev(hdk)
>> Jul 26 18:07:59 blackbox kernel: md: ... autorun DONE.
>>
>> So hde is not fresh (it has been removed from the array for quite some
>> time now) and hdg has an invalid superblock.
>>
>> Any advice on what I should do now? Should I better try to rebuild the
>> array with hde or with hdg?
>>
>>
>> Greetings,
>> Frank
>> -
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>>
>>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-26 23:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-26 17:03 Failed RAID-5 with 4 disks Frank Blendinger
2005-07-26 21:58 ` Tyler
2005-07-26 22:36 ` Dan Stromberg
2005-07-26 23:12 ` Tyler [this message]
2005-09-16 11:36 ` Frank Blendinger
[not found] ` <432AFA95.3040709@h3c.com>
2005-09-16 19:09 ` Frank Blendinger
2005-09-16 19:52 ` Mike Hardy
2005-09-17 9:31 ` Burkhard Carstens
2005-09-17 16:46 ` Frank Blendinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42E6C342.9000304@dtbb.net \
--to=pml@dtbb.net \
--cc=fb@intoxicatedmind.net \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).