linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Myers <mikesm559@yahoo.com>
To: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>, Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Adaptec raid congtrollers for SATA disks under software raid
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:07:23 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <430424.80078.qm@web30802.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (raw)

Well, I can get the 16 port adaptecs for the same price ($100) from a local shop disposing of servers from failed companies. So the price isn't an issue.  It's density.  I'd like to be able to hang 24+ drives off one system, so I can't get there by using 4 port PCI-E cards.   Not enough slots, and the 4 port cards cost almost as much as the 16 port port adaptecs I can get.

What I am asking about is the comparative performance of 8 and 16 port SATA controllers being used in software raid.  It makes no sense to do this if you are paying retail prices for them I know...  

So, back to the question at hand - what is the best performing 8 or 16 port SATA controller (hardware raid on board or not) available?

Thx
Mike




----- Original Message ----
From: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Cc: Mike Myers <mikesm559@yahoo.com>; linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2008 5:19:46 AM
Subject: Re: Adaptec raid congtrollers for SATA disks under software raid

Dear Justin Piszcz,

In message <alpine.DEB.1.10.0810310813240.468@p34.internal.lan> you wrote:
> 
> > We made really good experience with the Supermicro AOC-SAT2-MV8 cards.
...
> Lets be frank- almost all(?) RAID controllers you must export the disks 
> via JBOD and they cost hundreds to thousands of dollars.  Doing SW RAID 
> via JBOD IMO is not a great idea-- I'd use individual 2 or 4 port SATA 
> controllers on PCI-e.

Right. The AOC-SAT2-MV8 is a 8 port PCI-X controller without any RAID
support - and costs just around $ 100. That's why I like it.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de
The optimum committee has no members.
                                                   - Norman Augustine



      

             reply	other threads:[~2008-10-31 18:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-31 18:07 Mike Myers [this message]
2008-10-31 19:58 ` Adaptec raid congtrollers for SATA disks under software raid Wolfgang Denk
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-10-31 19:23 Mike Myers
2008-10-31 18:09 Mike Myers
2008-10-31 18:48 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-10-31  5:21 David Lethe
2008-10-31  4:37 Mike Myers
2008-10-31 10:50 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-10-31 12:14   ` Justin Piszcz
2008-10-31 12:19     ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-10-31 12:22       ` Justin Piszcz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=430424.80078.qm@web30802.mail.mud.yahoo.com \
    --to=mikesm559@yahoo.com \
    --cc=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wd@denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).