From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "bart@ardistech.com" Subject: Re: MD or MDADM bug? Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 08:38:13 +0200 Message-ID: <431D3955.AFFFC57A@ardistech.com> References: <015901c5af3b$e0885710$c100a8c0@NCNF5131FTH> <17176.9057.119383.787644@cse.unsw.edu.au> <01ac01c5afa6$3d4d8690$c100a8c0@NCNF5131FTH> <17176.13548.477061.774536@cse.unsw.edu.au> <001c01c5b004$64c902e0$c700a8c0@NCNF5131FTH> <17176.51414.689631.346198@cse.unsw.edu.au> <003501c5b016$cc5d68d0$c700a8c0@NCNF5131FTH> <17177.7688.922030.788691@cse.unsw.edu.au> <43195D20.1070103@dtbb.net> <17178.37305.857263.952767@cse.unsw.edu.au> <62b0912f05090509457a790e22@mail.gmail.com> <17180.62221.163087.348031@cse.unsw.edu.au> Reply-To: bart@ardistech.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Neil Brown Cc: Molle Bestefich , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids Neil, Thanks for your explanation about the kernel autodetect pitfalls. IMHO having a form of kernel space autodetect is an important feature in Linux. It allows you to use a real mirror for the root filessystem. When assambling is done based on root fs files this feature will be lost and the only alternative would be hardware RAID again. > > On Monday September 5, molle.bestefich@gmail.com wrote: > > Neil Brown wrote: > > > No. > > > I've never liked kernel autodetect, and while I won't break it, I > > Why is it that people never complain about having to put information > in /etc/fstab about what to mount, but they cannot cope with having to > put similar information in /etc/mdadm.conf about what to assemble?? > They would when mounting the root would depend on /etc/fstab :) Bart