linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eyal Lebedinsky <eyal@eyal.emu.id.au>
To: Thorild Selen <thorild@Update.UU.SE>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid list <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Promise SATAII150 TX4 or raidreconf broken
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 01:50:56 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43245260.6030907@eyal.emu.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <x3kfysdq846.fsf@Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE>

Thorild Selen wrote:
> If you search a bit in the linux-ide and linux-kernel mailing list
> archives, you will find that several people before have had problems
> with SATA150-TX4 and SATAII150-TX4 (see for example posts by Jim
> Ramsay, Joerg Sommrey and me).

Following up on this information I did more testing.

I verified that creating a 2-disk raid-5 and extending it to 3 disks
always works. 3-disk to 4-disk end up corrupted.

BTW I had to change the check in raidreconf for a minimum of raid5
disks from 3 to 2. It worked just fine.

I then moved the first two disks to the motherboard (sd[cd] left on
the TX4). The situation remained the same (but I did get better
performance).

I am now less inclined to blame the TX4 and lean more towards
raidreconf.

I need to create a final test where I hit the disks concurrently
without raidreconf to see how they fair...

I did some tests and so far failed to provoke any i/o error.

-- 
Eyal Lebedinsky (eyal@eyal.emu.id.au) <http://samba.org/eyal/>
	attach .zip as .dat

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-09-11 15:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <430E4AB0.2060600@eyal.emu.id.au>
     [not found] ` <4313E433.1080602@pobox.com>
2005-09-10  8:23   ` Promise SATAII150 TX4 or raidreconf broken Eyal Lebedinsky
     [not found]   ` <43223709.8090002@eyal.emu.id.au>
     [not found]     ` <x3kfysdq846.fsf@Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE>
2005-09-11 15:50       ` Eyal Lebedinsky [this message]
2005-09-12 22:50       ` Promise SATAII150 TX4 or raidreconf broken - answer Eyal Lebedinsky
2005-09-18  8:56         ` Tyler
2005-09-18  9:56           ` Eyal Lebedinsky
2005-09-10 12:55 Promise SATAII150 TX4 or raidreconf broken Henrik Holst

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43245260.6030907@eyal.emu.id.au \
    --to=eyal@eyal.emu.id.au \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thorild@Update.UU.SE \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).