From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tyler Subject: Re: Good, recent FS comparison? Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 00:35:30 -0700 Message-ID: <432A75C2.2090808@dtbb.net> References: <6d5bedd8050915131148b8108a@mail.gmail.com> <432A37BF.7060305@dtbb.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jon Lewis Cc: Linux RAID Mailing List List-Id: linux-raid.ids Jon Lewis wrote: > What kernels/XFS versions have you had good luck with? I have one large > raid with XFS, and it keeps doing: > > Corruption of in-memory data detected. Shutting down filesystem > > umount/mount fixes it...for a few days. I gave SGI's latest 2.4 kernel > CVS tree a try, and found it broke NFS export of XFS, so I couldn't run > it long enough to see if it fixed the first problem. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Jon Lewis | I route > Senior Network Engineer | therefore you are > Atlantic Net | _________ > http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________ A debian 3.1 Sarge sytem running kernel 2.6.11.7 (vanilla), and xfsprogs v2.6.28-1. I did a search on google for those errors.. the ones I spotted, that seemed interesting, mentioned problems with kernel 2.6.11.6, 2.6.13 (using SGI-XFS CVS), but that 2.6.12 (SGI-XFS CVS-2005-06-14_05:00_UTC) was working without a problem. Regards, Tyler. -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.0/103 - Release Date: 9/15/2005