From: Mike Hardy <mhardy@h3c.com>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: no reconstruction in 2.6.14.2?
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 13:14:26 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <437F95B2.5050602@h3c.com> (raw)
I meant to send this to the list as well, and sent it to just Carlos
instead. Obviously chime in if I'm off base.
-Mike
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: no reconstruction in 2.6.14.2?
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 13:13:11 -0800
From: Mike Hardy <mhardy@h3c.com>
To: Carlos Carvalho <carlos@fisica.ufpr.br>
References: <17279.33939.476421.616066@fisica.ufpr.br>
One of the things you get with newer kernels is that the md driver more
aggressively marks the array clean, typically very quickly after the
last write was issued.
The benefit is that more often than not even if you shut down
unexpectedly, the arrays are clean and you don't have to resync on startup.
So I think the behavior is expected.
If you were to run bonnie++ against the array, and shut down abruptly,
you would most likely be unclean and get the resync.
-Mike
Carlos Carvalho wrote:
> I've just installed a new server with a 5-disk raid5 and kernel
> 2.6.14.2. To check something I did a hard reset without shutdown and
> on reboot the machine didn't do any automatic resync; all arrays are
> shown clean.
>
> Is this some automatic intent-logging or another 2.6 feature (the
> machine had been really idle for minutes before the reset)??? This is
> my first 2.6 raid5 and with 2.4 resync does happen...
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next reply other threads:[~2005-11-19 21:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-19 21:14 Mike Hardy [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-11-19 20:01 no reconstruction in 2.6.14.2? Carlos Carvalho
2005-11-19 22:22 ` Neil Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=437F95B2.5050602@h3c.com \
--to=mhardy@h3c.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).