From: berk walker <berk@panix.com>
To: Francois Barre <francois.barre@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: Linux MD raid5 and reiser4... Any experience ?
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 06:59:18 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43BD0A16.7070700@panix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fd8d0180601050335ob7b791cm@mail.gmail.com>
Francois Barre wrote:
>2006/1/5, berk walker <berk@panix.com>:
>[...]
>
>
>>>
>>>
>>Ext3 does have a fine record. Might I also suggest an added expense of
>>18 1/2% and do RAID6 for better protection against data loss?
>>b-
>>
>>
>>
>
>Well, I guess so. I just hope I'll be given enough money for it, since
>it increases the cost per GB. Anyway I guess that it is preferable
>than a raid5 + 1 spare.
>By the way, not really a raid-oriented question, but what is the exact
>robustness of ext3 resizing ? I mean : what happens if the box crashes
>while resizing an ext3 ?
>This implies, of course, resizing capabilities for raid6, which is not
>implement yet. Is it ?
>-
>
>
I can not speak to that, sorry.
b-
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-05 11:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <fd8d0180601050104x15079396h@mail.gmail.com>
2006-01-05 9:06 ` Fwd: Linux MD raid5 and reiser4... Any experience ? Francois Barre
2006-01-05 10:14 ` Daniel Pittman
2006-01-05 11:21 ` Francois Barre
2006-01-05 11:31 ` Gordon Henderson
2006-01-06 6:33 ` Daniel Pittman
2006-01-06 9:47 ` Simon Valiquette
2006-01-06 10:50 ` Francois Barre
2006-01-06 19:28 ` Forrest Taylor
2006-01-06 11:03 ` Kanotix crashed my raid PFC
2006-01-06 12:02 ` PFC
2006-01-06 12:08 ` PFC
2006-01-06 22:01 ` PFC
[not found] ` <200601090803.03588.mlaks@verizon.net>
2006-01-09 18:30 ` PFC
2006-01-06 19:05 ` Fwd: Linux MD raid5 and reiser4... Any experience ? Mike Hardy
2006-01-08 2:53 ` Daniel Pittman
2006-01-05 11:26 ` berk walker
2006-01-05 11:35 ` Francois Barre
2006-01-05 11:43 ` Gordon Henderson
2006-01-05 11:59 ` berk walker [this message]
2006-01-05 13:13 ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2006-01-05 13:38 ` John Stoffel
2006-01-05 14:03 ` Francois Barre
2006-01-05 18:55 ` John Stoffel
2006-01-06 9:08 ` Francois Barre
2006-01-06 10:49 ` Andre Majorel
2006-01-09 8:00 ` Molle Bestefich
2006-01-09 8:16 ` Gordon Henderson
2006-01-09 9:00 ` Francois Barre
2006-01-09 9:24 ` Molle Bestefich
2006-01-05 17:32 Andrew Burgess
2006-01-05 17:50 ` Francois Barre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43BD0A16.7070700@panix.com \
--to=berk@panix.com \
--cc=francois.barre@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).