From: Simon Valiquette <v.simon@ieee.org>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: Linux MD raid5 and reiser4... Any experience ?
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 04:47:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43BE3C99.4050706@ieee.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fd8d0180601050321k19f12f53r@mail.gmail.com>
Francois Barre a écrit :
> 2006/1/5, Daniel Pittman <daniel@rimspace.net>:
>
>>Francois Barre <francois.barre@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>>Well, I think everything is in the subject... I am looking at this
>>>solution for a 6*250GB raid5 data server, evolving in a 12*250 rai5 in
>>>the months to come... Performance is absolutely not a big issue for
>>>me, but I would not appreciate any data loss.
>
> Well, as far as I understood it (that is, not so far :-p), reiser4
> seemed to have a stronger and more efficient journal than ext3. That
> is not what everyone believes, but reiser4 was to be designed that way
> more or less... But I guess that ext3 and its very-heavily-tested
> journal can still be more trusted than any newcomer.
>
> Truth is, I would have been glad to play with reiser4 on a large
> amount of data, just because I was interrested on the theories behind
> it (including the database-filesystem strange wedding Hans tried to
> organize). Maybe it's too great a risk for a production system.
>
> Well, anyway, thanks for the advice. Guess I'll have to stay on ext3
> if I don't want to have nightmares...
AFAIK, ext3 volume cannot be bigger than 4TB on a 32 bits system.
I think it is important you know that in case it could be a concern
for you.
Personnally, I also don't like using ext2/3 on a array bigger than
2TB. With 12x250GB, you are already well over 2TB, and maybe some day
you will realize that you needs more than 4TB. If you have a 64 bits
computers, just forget what I said (16TB is the limit).
On production server with large RAID array, I tends to like very
much XFS and trust it more than ReiserFS (I had some bad experience
with ReiserFS in the past). You can also grow a XFS filesystem live,
which is really nice.
XFS is finally much faster than EXT3 and self-defragmenting, but
that was not a concern for you anyway.
Simon Valiquette
http://gulus.USherbrooke.ca
http://www.gulus.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-06 9:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <fd8d0180601050104x15079396h@mail.gmail.com>
2006-01-05 9:06 ` Fwd: Linux MD raid5 and reiser4... Any experience ? Francois Barre
2006-01-05 10:14 ` Daniel Pittman
2006-01-05 11:21 ` Francois Barre
2006-01-05 11:31 ` Gordon Henderson
2006-01-06 6:33 ` Daniel Pittman
2006-01-06 9:47 ` Simon Valiquette [this message]
2006-01-06 10:50 ` Francois Barre
2006-01-06 19:28 ` Forrest Taylor
2006-01-06 11:03 ` Kanotix crashed my raid PFC
2006-01-06 12:02 ` PFC
2006-01-06 12:08 ` PFC
2006-01-06 22:01 ` PFC
[not found] ` <200601090803.03588.mlaks@verizon.net>
2006-01-09 18:30 ` PFC
2006-01-06 19:05 ` Fwd: Linux MD raid5 and reiser4... Any experience ? Mike Hardy
2006-01-08 2:53 ` Daniel Pittman
2006-01-05 11:26 ` berk walker
2006-01-05 11:35 ` Francois Barre
2006-01-05 11:43 ` Gordon Henderson
2006-01-05 11:59 ` berk walker
2006-01-05 13:13 ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2006-01-05 13:38 ` John Stoffel
2006-01-05 14:03 ` Francois Barre
2006-01-05 18:55 ` John Stoffel
2006-01-06 9:08 ` Francois Barre
2006-01-06 10:49 ` Andre Majorel
2006-01-09 8:00 ` Molle Bestefich
2006-01-09 8:16 ` Gordon Henderson
2006-01-09 9:00 ` Francois Barre
2006-01-09 9:24 ` Molle Bestefich
2006-01-05 17:32 Andrew Burgess
2006-01-05 17:50 ` Francois Barre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43BE3C99.4050706@ieee.org \
--to=v.simon@ieee.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).