linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Valiquette <v.simon@ieee.org>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: Linux MD raid5 and reiser4... Any experience ?
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 04:47:05 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43BE3C99.4050706@ieee.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fd8d0180601050321k19f12f53r@mail.gmail.com>

Francois Barre a écrit :
> 2006/1/5, Daniel Pittman <daniel@rimspace.net>:
> 
>>Francois Barre <francois.barre@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>>Well, I think everything is in the subject... I am looking at this
>>>solution for a 6*250GB raid5 data server, evolving in a 12*250 rai5 in
>>>the months to come... Performance is absolutely not a big issue for
>>>me, but I would not appreciate any data loss.
> 
> Well, as far as I understood it (that is, not so far :-p), reiser4
> seemed to have a stronger and more efficient journal than ext3. That
> is not what everyone believes, but reiser4 was to be designed that way
> more or less... But I guess that ext3 and its very-heavily-tested
> journal can still be more trusted than any newcomer.
> 
> Truth is, I would have been glad to play with reiser4 on a large
> amount of data, just because I was interrested on the theories behind
> it (including the database-filesystem strange wedding Hans tried to
> organize). Maybe it's too great a risk for a production system.
> 
> Well, anyway, thanks for the advice. Guess I'll have to stay on ext3
> if I don't want to have nightmares...

  AFAIK, ext3 volume cannot be bigger than 4TB on a 32 bits system.
I think it is important you know that in case it could be a concern
for you.

  Personnally, I also don't like using ext2/3 on a array bigger than
2TB.  With 12x250GB, you are already well over 2TB, and maybe some day
you will realize that you needs more than 4TB.  If you have a 64 bits
computers, just forget what I said (16TB is the limit).

  On production server with large RAID array, I tends to like very
much XFS and trust it more than ReiserFS (I had some bad experience
with ReiserFS in the past).  You can also grow a XFS filesystem live,
which is really nice.

  XFS is finally much faster than EXT3 and self-defragmenting, but
that was not a concern for you anyway.

Simon Valiquette
http://gulus.USherbrooke.ca
http://www.gulus.org

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-01-06  9:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <fd8d0180601050104x15079396h@mail.gmail.com>
2006-01-05  9:06 ` Fwd: Linux MD raid5 and reiser4... Any experience ? Francois Barre
2006-01-05 10:14   ` Daniel Pittman
2006-01-05 11:21     ` Francois Barre
2006-01-05 11:31       ` Gordon Henderson
2006-01-06  6:33       ` Daniel Pittman
2006-01-06  9:47       ` Simon Valiquette [this message]
2006-01-06 10:50         ` Francois Barre
2006-01-06 19:28           ` Forrest Taylor
2006-01-06 11:03         ` Kanotix crashed my raid PFC
2006-01-06 12:02           ` PFC
2006-01-06 12:08             ` PFC
2006-01-06 22:01               ` PFC
     [not found]                 ` <200601090803.03588.mlaks@verizon.net>
2006-01-09 18:30                   ` PFC
2006-01-06 19:05         ` Fwd: Linux MD raid5 and reiser4... Any experience ? Mike Hardy
2006-01-08  2:53         ` Daniel Pittman
2006-01-05 11:26     ` berk walker
2006-01-05 11:35       ` Francois Barre
2006-01-05 11:43         ` Gordon Henderson
2006-01-05 11:59         ` berk walker
2006-01-05 13:13         ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2006-01-05 13:38   ` John Stoffel
2006-01-05 14:03     ` Francois Barre
2006-01-05 18:55       ` John Stoffel
2006-01-06  9:08         ` Francois Barre
2006-01-06 10:49           ` Andre Majorel
2006-01-09  8:00             ` Molle Bestefich
2006-01-09  8:16               ` Gordon Henderson
2006-01-09  9:00                 ` Francois Barre
2006-01-09  9:24                   ` Molle Bestefich
2006-01-05 17:32 Andrew Burgess
2006-01-05 17:50 ` Francois Barre

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43BE3C99.4050706@ieee.org \
    --to=v.simon@ieee.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).