linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
To: "Bailey, Scott" <scott.bailey@eds.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Adding Reed-Solomon Personality to MD, need help/advice
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 12:49:33 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43C150AD.1080601@tmr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E26C409DCE780347BD93D08771FF08E90129DB3D@usahm236.amer.corp.eds.com>

Bailey, Scott wrote:

>Interestingly, I was just browsing this paper
>http://www.cs.utk.edu/%7Eplank/plank/papers/CS-05-569.html which appears
>to be quite on-topic for this discussion. I admit my eyes glaze over
>during intensive math discussions but it appears tuned RS might not be
>as horrible as you'd think since apparently state-of-the-art now
>provides tricks to avoid the Galois Field operations that used to be
>required.
>
>The thought that came to my mind was "how does md's RAID-6 personality
>compare to EVENODD coding?"
>
>Wondering if my home server will ever have enough storage for these
>discussions to become non-academic for me, :-) 
>
The problem is not having storage, it's having backup. The properties of 
backup are
- able to be moved to off-site storage
- cheap and fast enough to use regularly

Making storage more reliable is a desirable end, but it doesn't guard 
against many common failures such as controllers going bad and writing 
unreadable sectors all over before total failure, fire, flood, and 
software errors in the kernel code. While none of these is common in the 
sense of everyday, they are all common in the sense of "I never heard of 
that happening" response.

-- 
bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
  CTO TMR Associates, Inc
  Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979


  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-01-08 17:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-03 22:08 Adding Reed-Solomon Personality to MD, need help/advice Bailey, Scott
2006-01-05  0:23 ` Jeff Breidenbach
2006-01-08 17:49 ` Bill Davidsen [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-01-31  6:59 Nathan Lewis
2004-01-31  7:20 ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-01-31 10:53 ` Neil Brown
2004-01-31 18:56   ` Nathan Lewis
2004-02-13  4:35   ` Nathan Lewis
2004-02-13 14:18     ` Ming Zhang
2004-02-13 20:54       ` Nathan Lewis
2005-11-21 13:11 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2005-12-29 18:40   ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-12-29 19:23     ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
2005-12-29 19:54     ` Jeff Breidenbach
2005-12-29 21:14       ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43C150AD.1080601@tmr.com \
    --to=davidsen@tmr.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=scott.bailey@eds.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).