From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bill Davidsen Subject: Re: Adding Reed-Solomon Personality to MD, need help/advice Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 12:49:33 -0500 Message-ID: <43C150AD.1080601@tmr.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Bailey, Scott" Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids Bailey, Scott wrote: >Interestingly, I was just browsing this paper >http://www.cs.utk.edu/%7Eplank/plank/papers/CS-05-569.html which appears >to be quite on-topic for this discussion. I admit my eyes glaze over >during intensive math discussions but it appears tuned RS might not be >as horrible as you'd think since apparently state-of-the-art now >provides tricks to avoid the Galois Field operations that used to be >required. > >The thought that came to my mind was "how does md's RAID-6 personality >compare to EVENODD coding?" > >Wondering if my home server will ever have enough storage for these >discussions to become non-academic for me, :-) > The problem is not having storage, it's having backup. The properties of backup are - able to be moved to off-site storage - cheap and fast enough to use regularly Making storage more reliable is a desirable end, but it doesn't guard against many common failures such as controllers going bad and writing unreadable sectors all over before total failure, fire, flood, and software errors in the kernel code. While none of these is common in the sense of everyday, they are all common in the sense of "I never heard of that happening" response. -- bill davidsen CTO TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979