From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jacob Madsen Subject: Re: blog entry on RAID limitation Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 17:42:02 +0100 Message-ID: <43CD1E5A.3050802@mungo.dk> References: <8E5ACAE05E6B9E44A2903C693A5D4E8A097F6C86@hqemmail02.nvidia.com> <1137487538.309F9186@bd12.dngr.org> <17356.51593.481883.173707@cse.unsw.edu.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <17356.51593.481883.173707@cse.unsw.edu.au> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids Neil Brown wrote: > In general, I think increasing the connection between the filesystem > and the volume manager/virtual storage is a good idea. Finding the > right balance is not going to be trivial. ZFS has taken one very > interesting approach. There are others. > Just out of curiosity... When you say there are others, are you then refering to existing solutions or just saying other approaches will be developed in the future?