From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Phillip Susi Subject: Re: [PATCH 000 of 5] md: Introduction Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 18:26:43 -0500 Message-ID: <43D02033.4070008@cfl.rr.com> References: <26A66BC731DAB741837AF6B2E29C1017D47EA0@xmb-hkg-413.apac.cisco.com> <17358.52476.290687.858954@cse.unsw.edu.au> <43D00FFA.1040401@cfl.rr.com> <17360.5011.975665.371008@cse.unsw.edu.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <17360.5011.975665.371008@cse.unsw.edu.au> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Neil Brown Cc: Jan Engelhardt , "Lincoln Dale (ltd)" , Michael Tokarev , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Steinar H. Gunderson" List-Id: linux-raid.ids Neil Brown wrote: > > The in-kernel autodetection in md is purely legacy support as far as I > am concerned. md does volume detection in user space via 'mdadm'. > > What other "things like" were you thinking of. > Oh, I suppose that's true. Well, another thing is your new mods to support on the fly reshaping, which dm could do from user space. Then of course, there's multipath and snapshots and other lvm things which you need dm for, so why use both when one will do? That's my take on it.